|New blocker policy|
|14:57:19 May 10th 09 - Mr. Garlic:|
I'm gonna tell you a story. Once upon a time there was a kd(lets call them A) that let their allies(lets call them B) pass their blockers into a totally sealed area. Back in those days you had great walls and could easily seal off massive parts of the map. Kingdom C was NAPed with kingdom A but wanted to kill kingdom B wich they couldnt. Massive flame erupted and the VU community decided that from this day on nobody would be allowed to harbour a kingdom like that ever again.
|15:19:03 May 10th 09 - Mr. Garlic:|
|15:25:17 May 10th 09 - Prince Mielo:|
Nice trolling you got here :)
|15:35:15 May 10th 09 - Mr. Garlic:|
I'm not trolling. I'm suggesting for future eras NAP terms be written differently. I'm going to advocate this in our diplomacy with other kingdoms but if we are the only ones thinking like this it wont make a difference.
|15:47:00 May 10th 09 - Mr. Arkantos:|
thats not *beep*ming he stayed on topic *beep*.
|15:55:21 May 10th 09 - Mr. Garlic:|
Just like you are doing now huh? He accused me of trolling then cited something that I didnt say. Then he said he didnt know where I was going with my post.
|16:18:26 May 10th 09 - Chancellor Ademo:|
People need to be more open to other forms of agreements imo. If you want a "NAP" partner covering one of your flanks by not opening blockers, maybe the agreement should be a MPP instead.
|17:20:42 May 10th 09 - Prince Mielo:|
My post was a response to your topic, can't see any 'off topic' in that.
|20:22:24 May 10th 09 - Mr. Garlic:|
Why not? Why don't you like them? You haven't provided any arguments, thats the reason for my response to your first post.
|21:32:01 May 10th 09 - Prince Mielo:|
... Really, reread my post, it's quite clear what I'm saying here:
|21:32:03 May 10th 09 - Sir Santa:|
Many wont like them because what your suggesting would disadvantage everyone. They can no longer count on their NAPpartner to keep them safe and to defend their flanks, so they are more vulnerable.
|14:39:06 May 11th 09 - Sir Aby Normal:|
I say do away with blockers, naps, armies, and we can all live together in peace and harmony in the bright and shiny world of **Visual Farmtopia**
As for this:
I suggest that we hereon change the "NOT opening blocker policy" to a "Always opening blocker policy".
Don't you already do that?
|14:46:16 May 11th 09 - Mr. Garlic:|
Mielo, of course it is personal, thats why its in the politics forum not in suggestions. And its not as simple as just insisting on these terms whenever we form a NAP, becouse if that kd has the opposite terms with another kd we have trouble. Simply put: Before era of Sparker all kds had the terms I want us to have again, after it all kds have had what we have now. Its not something one kd can change, several of the major kds are needed for this to take presedence.
|15:04:51 May 11th 09 - Commander Aligreat:|
In the old days it was possible, but now, with open worlds then every flank is at risk unless you make it in ur agreement that blockers should stay closed.
Also, everyone mass NAPs now.
So all people will do is NAP the majority of their flanks and find an unclosed blocker leading into enemy territory and just rape them.
|21:29:03 May 11th 09 - Mr. Ninjas Theyre Everywhere:|
They already do that to many people are afraid to die like its going to be the end of the world.
|03:20:35 May 12th 09 - General Ptang Bang Kipperbang:|
ive a better idea, no one nap again, ever :D
|05:41:19 May 12th 09 - Commander Aligreat:|
better idea, no kingdoms and no NAPs.
|[Top] Pages: 1|
My bookmarksOld forum design