Forums / In game politics / Embassy of the RDR

Embassy of the RDR
23:25:21 Nov 15th 07 - Mr. Zateb Kazim:

Actually, the tag of REVOLUTION is KoW, for kingdom of war.  that make no sense becuse they can not be anarchys if they are kingdom....learn yur ideologys befor you make a kd.


23:37:16 Nov 15th 07 - Duke Borazon:

yeah, they revolted against RDR and renewed the kd, KoW.  Makes perfect sense to me.


00:04:29 Nov 16th 07 - Mr. Milovich:

Or it doesnt matter what their ideology is since this is just a game and they just wanted a decent name.


01:40:18 Nov 16th 07 - Mr. Arthion:

we were called to anarchy so that we could reclaim our true Identity. Now that we are free we honor that symbol because anarchy is a method of Revolution that we choose to use.

Wow, its true!!.....honors students can BS anything they want to defend.XD


02:36:22 Nov 16th 07 - Sir Archias:

lmao, wait till next year :P


04:11:25 Nov 16th 07 - Mr. Atreides:

Sorry Rhianna. I guess I misunderstood. I don't really know much about what's going on there, but from the way the posts went, it seemed that Trenton was working with you guys (DR). That's why I said that.....if his entire kingdom (all traitors lol?) just popped up and started fighting everyone, my statements no longer apply. If you guys are allied with them though, it's basically the same thing as accepting them into DR.....dishonorable. But, that's just my opinion I guess. Again, if they just popped up and started fighting all, my negative comments don't apply at all.


14:12:43 Nov 16th 07 - Ms. Rhiannia:

actually, we are fighting russians, russians had a revolt...those members of russians that revolted formed a kingdom together and are also fighting russians. that is just how it is.there are many kingdoms fighting russians.


19:46:33 Nov 16th 07 - Mr. Brinsbane:

ya that is about how it went.except you left out the part that we are owning the RDR


00:48:44 Nov 17th 07 - Mr. Zateb Kazim:

i just see on my friends account in zeta, like all nations fight nation rdr...very cowardly, unless a jihad was called against them i do not no???


00:57:26 Nov 17th 07 - Mr. Arthion:

when a KD has over 40 members like they used to, they make a pretty big target. now there down to 30 which is still way more than anybody else has.


01:11:34 Nov 17th 07 - Mr. Justanius Fontainius X:

actually rdr attacked dr thinking dr was an easy target they found out we wernt


23:55:50 Nov 17th 07 - Mr. Zateb Kazim:

kd rdr has 40 members bla bla bla, that is their decision, their internal policy... who ar you to intervene in the affairs of another kd that you ar not part of, arthion?


00:08:59 Nov 18th 07 - Mr. Justanius Fontainius X:

he didnt intervene...he just gave them some advice


00:38:25 Nov 18th 07 - Mr. Zateb Kazim:

Don't play stupid me jf...i saw he too was take part in the killing...and i did not direct my statement to you anyways, so, with all due respect, 5TFU.. 


00:49:30 Nov 18th 07 - Mr. Arthion:

tell me if I'm not in the KD then how can I intervene with their there policies? ...it seems to me all I can do is comment on them, which I did.

are you in RDR?


02:08:58 Nov 18th 07 - Mr. Zateb Kazim:

Man, it is up to kd RDR how many member they want to have, not of your buisness or your kd buisness.

i was in rdr, someone killed me from you or dr.


02:15:00 Nov 18th 07 - Mr. Arthion:

Then I can see why your so uptight, but seriously settle a little; its not that big of a deal.

If you were near the southern end of your Core then it was definitely me.


02:17:08 Nov 18th 07 - Mr. Zateb Kazim:

all i was trying to do is play this game and learn, no other kd accept me, one did,  and i disliked thier leader because he ordered around and would not help tell me.  sir gennady mikhailov help me alot, rdr help me alot, gm was good leader, best one.


And let me say one thing more, the kd rdr let you come in, with your other kd mates, they treate you as equals, we all did, and you go around and do what you did? Bottom line: you may be killing them rdr in this war, but you will have no victory here, victory is only for the honorable one.  I thought a good man of you when you joined us, but i guess you are nobody but betrayer. 



02:25:26 Nov 18th 07 - Mr. Arthion:

I would say I have victory....I don't know what you call victory, but here is a lesson for you people don't like being killed or forced into submittion. So one day if you become a leader or a vice do not do what the russians did and accept anyone in there KD.  With all those people theres bound to be trouble especially from Ex enemies. Just kill off your enemies it makes you stronger and them weaker.

And about being unhonorable. We did not attack RDRs core until way past the 24 tick mark we secured our core built up troops and then sent them, and you guys still were not prepared. Thats not our fault.


04:00:43 Nov 18th 07 - Ms. Rhiannia:

zateb...this is a war game. you wish to learn? learn by the mistakes, the actions of others so that each era you improve. dont waste time cutting others down...and it IS a waste of time because each person sees their actions as done with a justifiable reason and if anyone disagrees...that is just an opposing opinion to them, nothing more. so your time is better spent changing your self. if an action is something you dont approve of...make sure YOU never do it. if it is one you do approve of...then do it. worry about your reputation and not others and you will enjoy the game more.

as to what arthion and his friends did...it is not honourable nor dishonourable...if it had been a real war, they would have been applauded as heros by their country men for taking such a risk to infiltrate an enemy kingdom, learn its secrets and then safely get out and use those secrets against it...and since this is a war game...every one has heard the saying....all is fair in love and war....


04:21:09 Nov 18th 07 - Mr. Atreides:

And this game is NOT real life.........when will people learn? True, betrayal may be successful, but breaking an NAP is not very honorable....and if you're in their core, even the 24 NAP cancellation period is not good enough. That is just cheap, dirty, underhanded playing. Ganging up on a kingdom is pretty low too.


04:50:47 Nov 18th 07 - Mr. Brinsbane:

yea 6 against 30 is ganging up on them.


05:13:10 Nov 18th 07 - Mr. Arthion:

Let me explain this to you Atreides. Revolution and RDR never had a NAP we revolted and decided that ,even though there is no rule for how long you can't attack after revolting, we would wait the standard 24 ticks to make sure that no one would label us unhonorable.

Tell me what else should we have done? Waited 48 ticks just for the heck of it or is that not enough maybe we just should have waited to the end of the era then attack them the next era. would that have been enough for you. Or would you have called us unhonorable either way because you honestly don't have any idea what is going on?

We did what we could to make it honorable, but like Rhiannia said all is fair in war. And by the way we weren't in there core which further proves you have no idea what you are talking about. It took us a good 20 plus ticks added to the 24 we waited before we could even begin attacking their core.

What was so dirty about that?


06:16:21 Nov 18th 07 - Ms. Rhiannia:

Mr. Atreides

Report


11/17/2007 8:21:09 PM
And this game is NOT real life.........when will people learn? True, betrayal may be successful, but breaking an NAP is not very honorable....and if you're in their core, even the 24 NAP cancellation period is not good enough. That is just cheap, dirty, underhanded playing. Ganging up on a kingdom is pretty low too.

true this game is not real life...BUT IT IS A WAR GAME...and if you are not comfortable or dont like how it is played, then perhaps you should find a game more to your liking...because the facts are wether it is a game or not, it does mirror many aspects of real life, such as diplomacy and tactics or strategies...

personally, i do not find what arthion and his friends did to be so wrong. they were part of a kingdom...they strongly disagreed with the leader...they formed a group with a like mind and decided they would leave that kingdom and join with those kingdoms fighting against the kingdom they just left. this happens all the time. there is no wrongness or dishonour in how they went about it. the dishonour lies in immature people who have no clue what happened and try to slander those who took part and who know exactly why they did what they did.


06:27:02 Nov 18th 07 - Mr. Psychopomp:

KoW warred RDR earlier in the era.  KoW had 'internal issues', RDR 'won' the war.  RDR recruited the willing members of KoW.  With several new sizable members, RDR sought a new target, voted on it, and for some odd reason decided to war DR and Godlike at the same time.  As this begins, the former-KoW members decided to revolt.  So troublesome!  Now granted, I don't know what a good bit of the kingdom was doing, but they left an entire flank completely undefended, and had a somewhat weak offensive movement.  I suppose people were just a tad too comfortable with the KoW members that joined the kingdom.  And so it goes...being so spread out, it's a terrible pain to offer reinforcements in a timely fashion; several battlefronts are easy pickings and a handful of people are stuck solo.  People begin feeling like the kingdom isn't worth their time since assistance is scarce, and leave.  And some...revolt!  (Non-KoW members this time.)  All this fun stuff goes on...and Consequence starts to move in from the north...oh noes.  :O  So, divided on...*counts on fingers...one...two...three...four...five* fronts, RDR is left hobbling along, trying to survive.

Anyone with an expansionist ideal takes the chance of biting off more fat than they can chew.  Annexing every possible person into the kingdom wasn't the brightest idea.  Granted it made for attractive numbers on the kingdom page, but that's it.  Too many people, too many opinions, too much area, too much to be coordinated.

Would I have taken KoW into RDR after the first 'war'?  No.  :P  But I'm not the leader.  Did I 'trust' the ones that joined?  No.  :P  Why would you trust someone you just warred?  Common sense if you ask me.  Would I join a kingdom with the intention of revolting later?  Nah, not my style, not something I consider honorable.  Does that mean it's plausible for others to do it?  Of course.  Would I have warred Godlike or DR for fun?  Probably not, but again, not my decision.

@ Brinsbane.  '...6 against 30...' is a foolish statement.  It shouldn't need explanation, but I shall offer some for the fun of it.  Half of RDR is inactive.  30 ACTIVE members wouldn't have been such a pushover, eh?  '6'?  Only...about the number of separate parties attacking RDR.  Parties, not individuals--that amount is significantly higher, as one could imagine.

I'm not claiming RDR is completely exempt from fault;t oo many inactives, too many farmers, too many...people not 100% sure what they're doing.  (This comes as a result of actually allowing new players into the kingdom.)  If RDR was actually coordinated, I'm almost certain things would have gone slightly differently.  Gennady was a good fella, I won't knock him, but for coordination?  We lacked considerably.  Granted, he did have some personal problems going on in real life.  I enjoyed his rhetoric.  :)

I'm sure I had something more to say...but it has seemed to disappear.  Ah well, maybe it will revisit. 

Cheers,
Psychopomp


06:29:26 Nov 18th 07 - Mr. Psychopomp:

Ahh, Rhiannia posted while I was in the process of typing.  Shame on her.

They didn't form a group with a like mind and then decide to leave, Rhian, they were part of a group from the start, before they even joined RDR...a group that happened to be a kingdom that warred RDR.  Personally I would say it was planned from the start, but that's just me.  :)

Cheers,
Psychopomp


09:35:04 Nov 18th 07 - Mr. Cat:

this is my story i was a good member of rdr and i like it a lot it was pretty good like when we separated ourselves into cores and different sections. then afte our victory over kow which i didnt help much only a lttle because i was focusing on my economy , i didn't pay too much attention to the new kow members. After i created my first city "kat" i decided to expand my armory and my army so then we had troubles and i decided to train troops the troubles were wheter we should fight consequence or bears when they were weaker. i voted for consequence because we had an nap with bears but someone mr.trenton strongly oppossed to fight cons and wanted to fight bears which was dishonorable because we had an nap with them. after that day i didnt trust him too much. then afte a few days i see the post on forums that we are fighting Godlike and i was like okay lets fight them so we did. i didnt help they were too far away. somehow we were also fighting dr. after i send all my troops down south well half way anyways i noticed that dr broke through our defenses and i brought my army back north but i was too late because dr took one of my cities already. as i was going back i noticed that mr.treton had a lot of troops and wondered why  he wasnt helping down south. so i asked him and i think he told me to mind my own bussiness that he had his own plans. thats when i noticed he was planning something so days before treton revolted i warned grennady of the possible revolt and he says he too noticed it but he did nothing about it. after that i did not know wheter to send my troops to the souththern wall and cover there or send my troops to attack dr. i decided to attack dr. afte that mr.treton revolted and i tried to encourage everyone on the south to leave their cities and go into the cenatral core and protect the walls but nobody listened. so then as a last resort when tretn easily broke through our walls i said i had no other choice but to leave although i did manage to kille like 60k of tretons troops then i noticed it was all over so  i ask mr.treton that if i left rdr he will not attack me, so i left rdr. i'm not a traitor wiith treton out of the way i focused more on dr and took my city back and holded them off for quite some time but again with no backup from rdr i couldn't hold them off forever and one day the took over my defensive city big kat and with that out of the way they proceeded and easily got through and now they are in or core i lost my two big citys and its all over for me. i had no support from rdr but im still loyal i did wat was best for the kingdom and i know it we just weren't organized. Now kill me mr.trenton for lying to you.


14:37:10 Nov 18th 07 - Mr. Arthion:


"Personally I would say it was planned from the start, but that's just me.  :)"

Actually it wasn't planned from the start after we were in the kd we noticed how unorganized  everybody was, how nobody (except a few) new what they were doing,  How much more power we had than anyone else in the KD and how easily it would be to reform our KD. So we started to plan our revolt.


15:58:02 Nov 18th 07 - Mr. Zateb Kazim:

To atredies:

No, no you do not. You hav far from it. So you say you wer force into being RDR, but gm told us that first he asked trenton if he need a kd, trenten say he did, and then he ask if rest of ex kows could join with him. you wer in no way forced, you signed the application, you swore the words <<Under oath, I swear to uphold the laws and constitution of the Russian Democratic Republic.>> so not only ar you un honourable but also a liar now too. if you cannot be trusted to hold that oath, what about naps and maps, you will betray those words too!~!~!

And how do you expect me and the rest for be prepared in only 24h??? my armies wer fighting in the east at DR, and the north at HELL. Same with all else. i though that south was secure, but then the betrayel of you. shame.

And Rhianna, unless you are atredies multi or something, stay out of our words. In my country, a man does not just walk into anothers discussion, it considered VERY rude.ty.



16:26:08 Nov 18th 07 - Mr. Revenge:

you where under oath?

how sad....


01:50:30 Nov 19th 07 - Sir Verll:

Mr. Zateb Kazim

Report


11/18/2007 3:58:02 PM
To atredies:

No, no you do not. You hav far from it. So you say you wer force into being RDR, but gm told us that first he asked trenton if he need a kd, trenten say he did, and then he ask if rest of ex kows could join with him. you wer in no way forced, you signed the application, you swore the words <<Under oath, I swear to uphold the laws and constitution of the Russian Democratic Republic.>> so not only ar you un honourable but also a liar now too. if you cannot be trusted to hold that oath, what about naps and maps, you will betray those words too!~!~!

And how do you expect me and the rest for be prepared in only 24h??? my armies wer fighting in the east at DR, and the north at HELL. Same with all else. i though that south was secure, but then the betrayel of you. shame.

And Rhianna, unless you are atredies multi or something, stay out of our words. In my country, a man does not just walk into anothers discussion, it considered VERY rude.ty.



Not in this forum....


03:31:14 Nov 19th 07 - Mr. Brinsbane:

don't say that KoW had 'internal issues' because there weren't

and you cant say we swore under oath because I didn't say that in my application


03:39:52 Nov 19th 07 - Ms. Rhiannia:

And Rhianna, unless you are atredies multi or something, stay out of our words. In my country, a man does not just walk into anothers discussion, it considered VERY rude.ty.



Not in this forum....

 

well said verll....zateb....since you did not start this thread...and no one has heard from you in it until JUST NOW...i would have to say that it is YOU who has just walked into another PERSONS conversation, one that was going quite well, THANK YOU, until you decided to jump in bashing people and cutting them down for no other reason that i can see but that they did something you didnt like...it is over and done with...get over it and move on...it does no good to sit there and stew over what can not be changed.


03:47:38 Nov 19th 07 - Mr. Arthion:

"And how do you expect me and the rest for be prepared in only 24h???"

well every other KD in VU has dealt with that standard since like the beginning of the game. Just because you guys couldn't do it doesn't mean that its unfair. Maybe it means that no matter how much time we gave you ; you wouldn't have been ready. No other KD in the game has complained after a KD gives them a 24 tick buffer. I think you guys are just taking the loss badly.


04:00:48 Nov 19th 07 - Mr. Chaos:

If that's so..than why are you still arguing about it. If it were me, I would just take the win gracefully and not stay around and bicker with them about it. If they are sore losers, that has nothing to do with you, you don't have to keep on going and insult them some more and just make their losing even harder for them to stomach.


07:00:23 Nov 19th 07 - Ms. Rhiannia:

mr chaos...get with it...arthion isnt trying to add insult to injury or stuff their victory down their throat...he would gladly have left well enough alone and not been "bickering" as you call it if certain people like zateb didnt complain about their action as being unfair or unhonourable...

i really have a problem with people who start something then say you are arguing or bickering when you are merely attempting to explain your position or point or trying to defend your situation and they wont listen making you repeat yourself, thereby causing you to "argue"...they never stop to consider that they are doing the very thing they are blaming you of doing.


17:51:42 Nov 19th 07 - Mr. Justanius Fontainius X:

well said rhianna , BRAVO!!!..3...2...1. okay guys rap it up rdr's dead now delete the embassy thread


18:06:04 Nov 19th 07 - Sir Griffith:

I would not consider us dead as of yet.. though it does seem that the gods wi*beep*. But I agree with Sieur Fontainius X.. delete the embassy thread. I have never seen so much useless crap take up so much space.


23:35:46 Nov 19th 07 - Mr. Brinsbane:

this isnt useless crap you are useless crap


03:12:15 Nov 20th 07 - Mr. Atreides:

Ms. Rhiannia

Report


11/18/2007 12:16:21 AM
Mr. Atreides

Report


11/17/2007 8:21:09 PM
And this game is NOT real life.........when will people learn? True, betrayal may be successful, but breaking an NAP is not very honorable....and if you're in their core, even the 24 NAP cancellation period is not good enough. That is just cheap, dirty, underhanded playing. Ganging up on a kingdom is pretty low too.

"true this game is not real life...BUT IT IS A WAR GAME...and if you are not comfortable or dont like how it is played, then perhaps you should find a game more to your liking...because the facts are wether it is a game or not, it does mirror many aspects of real life, such as diplomacy and tactics or strategies...

personally, i do not find what arthion and his friends did to be so wrong. they were part of a kingdom...they strongly disagreed with the leader...they formed a group with a like mind and decided they would leave that kingdom and join with those kingdoms fighting against the kingdom they just left. this happens all the time. there is no wrongness or dishonour in how they went about it. the dishonour lies in immature people who have no clue what happened and try to slander those who took part and who know exactly why they did what they did."


You're insulting me now :(
Sorry for picking on your statement, but it was just so tempting. Please don't say any crap about how I picked out 1 part of your post because the rest of your post does not justify it anyways. Leaving a kingdom in the middle of war.....dishonorable by the standards of just about every VU player. Leaving a kingdom in the middle of war, and then attacking that kingdom....wow......if you all actually think that is acceptable, and flame people who try to enlighten you on the fact that it's not, fine. I don't really care anymore....seriously, just try talking to ANY experienced player and they would agree that what you just mentioned are not "tactics," they're dirty, underhanded tricks.

I love this game, I love how all the real players play it.

*Puts on anit-flame shield and runs out*


03:47:12 Nov 20th 07 - Mr. Brinsbane:

they were at war with Dark Riders only. then we attacked and others followed seeing how weak they were. "they're dirty, underhanded tricks." we gave them a 24 tick warning. so we didn't do anything dishonorable. make sure you know what you are talking about before you say something


03:51:15 Nov 20th 07 - Mr. Iorek Byrnison:

they were at war with Dark Riders only. then we attacked and others followed seeing how weak they were. "they're dirty, underhanded tricks." we gave them a 24 tick warning. so we didn't do anything dishonorable. make sure you know what you are talking about before you say something

 

No, thats not dishonourable, thats barbaric.


03:56:12 Nov 20th 07 - Mr. Brinsbane:

what is barbaric us or the other KDs


03:56:26 Nov 20th 07 - Mr. Zateb Kazim:

lol rhianna still keep going, you not in kd revolution, you in dark riders, so dont talk to me, i not respond to you anyways.

 

Arthion:  we we'rnt capable of be prepaired, the war was already in the south, and the north, both norths.  Iorek, correct, they attack because weakness, like dishonorable barbarian scum they ar. Brinsbane, Arthion, Trenton, all untrustworthy, non intelligents...see here example:

 

Mr Brinsbane: this isnt useless crap you are useless crap

 

He insults another who he does not know, Griffith was explaining a point, no this thread no delete, it show how coward, backstabbers Revolution kd is.


04:01:43 Nov 20th 07 - Mr. Iorek Byrnison:

what is barbaric us or the other KDs

 

The lot of you are, cons, rev, godlike. 3kds on 1 sounds pretty damn barbaric to me. Granted they had 42 members, the most of those members were beginners, and you cant ridicule them for that, this is zetamania after all.

 

PS<> DR is the acception, on the half that RDR declared war on them.


04:23:20 Nov 20th 07 - Duke Borazon:

Yes you could call CON barbaric... because we are warring almost the whole map!


06:29:05 Nov 20th 07 - Sir Griffith:

lol... you guys need to go to Fantasia already Borazon ;)


22:21:28 Nov 20th 07 - Mr. Brinsbane:

ya Griffith have you seen the Zeta high scores?...lol


22:24:45 Nov 20th 07 - Duke Borazon:

Dude, im not even on hoh...


22:30:06 Nov 20th 07 - Sir Griffith:

Yes I have.. I believe thats what I was commenting on Sieur Brinsbane.


[Top]  Pages:  (back) 1 2 3 (next)

Login
Username: Don't have an account - Sign up!
Password: Forgot your password - Retrive it!

My bookmarksOld forum design


- close -
  Copyright © 1999-2024 Visual Utopia. All rights reserved. Page loaded in 0.02 seconds. Server time: 2:52:35 PM