Forums / In game politics / Kingdom DARK recruiting.
Kingdom DARK recruiting. | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
07:04:53 Dec 3rd 09 - Duke Ryan The Laughing Storm: Mr Elit, | ||||
07:06:40 Dec 3rd 09 - Pirate Suqah: In other words : | ||||
07:16:15 Dec 3rd 09 - Duke Ryan The Laughing Storm: No what Cullwych brought up was you not building walls in a city between us and our other cities. his city was there first so your city building walls in the first place was a breach in our nap as it limited his access to his own city to reinforce it. This was a clear term in our nap. | ||||
07:44:42 Dec 3rd 09 - Pirate Suqah: This was an unsolvable situation without breaking a single NAP. So to make it fair I broke both of them. PHI did not make an issue out of it, but you did. | ||||
07:54:29 Dec 3rd 09 - Psycho Delic Retarded Faux Nouveau: PHI stated they would attack anyone who NAPed us so they should break their NAP with you anyway. I understand your situation and I hope you understand ours. We like Domination but your relations with PHI are hard to work around. I think Domination has behaved fairly and blame PHI for any problems. I blame PHI for our problems with Ravage too. but upon further reflectiong it all comes back to Ryan. He is responsible for everything. I gave him permission to attack PHI last era so actually I am to blame and I accept that. | ||||
08:21:42 Dec 3rd 09 - Mr. Boombastic: well, considering dark have been agressively attacked all era and their cities are pretty much cornered by these attackers, i can't actually see how this war declaration would benefit them. So I would disagree they have done this for free cities and that it is more about honour. that may be foolhardy given their current situation and its a shame it couldn't be resolved amicably but breaches are breaches and you have to respect them for that. | ||||
08:35:21 Dec 3rd 09 - Mr. Elit: Basically Dark BREAK NAP with asking us for open block. Terms say clear blocks will stay closed and cant be open for attack NAP-Partners. PHI is our nap partner. Its not our fail you decide to set "alone" colony in hostile place with PHI. When you 'accept" for normal Dark to can pass our block for fight with Phi army you need to accept reverse for normal too. Here cant be DOUBLE standards! | ||||
10:17:44 Dec 3rd 09 - Psycho Delic Retarded Faux Nouveau: exactally boomtastic, I killed one scout. Not interested in getting free cities but in pointing out PHI challanged us and claimed they would fight Ryan & Palpy and all who NAP them. The arguement that PHI forced Domination to open makes me want to kill PHI more. Guys in my kingdom complain about Dom's breech then I say don't worry but it happens again so I jsut don't want t olook bad to my followers again. The whole era I was telling them not to attack Ravage we were friends and to be made to eat my words again just pisses me off. Actually what the heck we may as well fight rebirth and LH's too. we aren't choosy. | ||||
12:33:40 Dec 3rd 09 - Pirate Suqah: All Domination members, even vices, stay out of this. | ||||
15:54:10 Dec 3rd 09 - Duke Ryan The Laughing Storm: All Dark members feel free to post your opinion even if it conflicts with mine. | ||||
16:45:21 Dec 3rd 09 - Pirate Suqah: What you are saying is hypocritical. I'm sure you agree that I had to open for Cullwhch so he could reinforce his city, yet when PHI asks for the exact same blocker to be opened for the exact same NAP term, you say it's not allowed? | ||||
17:05:46 Dec 3rd 09 - Duke Ryan The Laughing Storm: Its not even remotely hypocritical Pirate and its obvious to anyone not trying to justify a breach. 1- the city should not have been built in the first place, I refer back to our nap which states very clearly not to add walls to citties built between us and our own cities(im not saying anything about blocking off an enemy although that is in the clause as well.). 2- of course I dont expect you to contact us before building every blocker, that was a ridiculous statement menat to make us sound unreasonable, I do however fully expect that when breaching a nap you would contact us. 3-if you had bothered to contact Dark leadership before breaching the nap we may have been more open to negotiation but seriously the manner in which you breached the nap was underhanded and now its all about justifying so you don't have to pay compensation. and making it look less dishonourable. I can honestly say I have not one single message either warning us that you were going to breach or letting us know that " hey im letting a huge enemy army through because they DEMANDED that I do so."
let me enlighten you things Dark is responsible for - NOT breaking agreements with any of our allies -ensuring that our members dont break agreements even inadvertantly -if an agreement is broken then compensating the aggrieved ally quickly and fairly. Things Dark is NOT responsible for -our allies breaking agreements with our enemies. -ensuring that people outside our kingdom keep their word -making sure that if an ally breaches a nap with an enemy that we allow the same ally to breach a nap with us JUST TO MAKE SURE ITS FAIR. lol WHO ARE YOU TRYING TO KID? is that clear enough for you? | ||||
17:13:32 Dec 3rd 09 - Duke Ryan The Laughing Storm: and again, NEGOTIATION means you give a little and we give a little, your idea of negotiation is to not admit fault and then basically tell us to go screw ourselves because you only broke the nap because you felt it was fair. LMAO. You had several options and YOU chose to try and bluster it out with justifications.
I don't get it, you are supposed to be intelligent ,yet having seen how we dealt with No honour and Phi breaching agreements did you honestly think we would suddenly turn into people who would simply quietly accept this simply because we are in dire straits and warring several people? | ||||
17:24:32 Dec 3rd 09 - Pirate Suqah: Okay, I tried doing this the nice way. 3-if you had bothered to contact Dark leadership before breaching the nap we may have been more open to negotiation but seriously the manner in which you breached the nap was underhanded and now its all about justifying so you don't have to pay compensation. and making it look less dishonourable. I can honestly say I have not one single message either warning us that you were going to breach or letting us know that " hey im letting a huge enemy army through because they DEMANDED that I do so." Exactly what Cullwhch DEMANDED to be let through the city in the first place with an army the same size. -making sure that if an ally breaches a nap with an enemy that we allow the same ally to breach a nap with us JUST TO MAKE SURE ITS FAIR. lol WHO ARE YOU TRYING TO KID? --> cry me a river Ryan, Kobuskan demanded the exact same thing that Cullwhch demanded a while ago. And now that you guys lost a city, you're going all Q_Q . Luckily the dark leader is more reasonable and understands our situation. So the problem has been resolved and I shall make no more replies about this subject. | ||||
17:27:26 Dec 3rd 09 - Pirate Suqah: and I did give your leader my apologies btw. | ||||
17:49:26 Dec 3rd 09 - Duke Ryan The Laughing Storm: Just to be clear, Dark is led by two people atm in case you thought I was simply a vice. I will discuss with Psycho when I get home. | ||||
15:25:37 Dec 4th 09 - Psycho Delic Retarded Faux Nouveau: | ||||
16:54:40 Dec 13th 09 - Psycho Delic Retarded Faux Nouveau:
| ||||
20:56:36 Dec 13th 09 - Dr. Happy Pants: Why would you scare us. This is a game! | ||||
02:04:41 Dec 14th 09 - Psycho Delic Retarded Faux Nouveau: it is quoted from your leader, "maybe u would scare ppl with your numbers". ask him. | ||||
21:42:53 Dec 18th 09 - Mr. Observerjoe: "MY word is very important to me and I wont compromise it over a shitty free online game." | ||||
[Top] Pages: (back) 1 2 |
My bookmarksOld forum design