Forums / In game politics / POLITICS 2

POLITICS 2
01:29:14 May 31st 07 - Mr. Dingleberry Dave:

The intention wasn't to gang up on the little kingdoms. The logical fallacy here seems to be that the top kingdoms get their kicks, or fun from beating up kingdoms who cannot put up a fight. That isn't the case. We like a challenge as much as the next kingdom, last era was a challenge and it was the mo*beep*n era we have had in some time, even though we were badly outgunned and outmanned by 5+ other kingdoms at once.

The only difference between this era and last era though is those who are on the receiving end of the alliance. Last era, Abydos, BACCUS etc had little qualm with aligning the top 5 kingdoms of*beep*ainst a lone LGC, fighting across the entire stretch of the map.. Furthermore, LGC made several attempts to even the odds at the time, by having some kingdoms back down to make the fight even, but because those kingdoms did not care about "gangbanging" LGC then, they all refused. So surely you would expect if they were to receive the same maltreatment, they would suck it up, take it on the chin and not complain? Oh, boy were you wrong.

So here comes this era. LGC inadvertently returns the favour, and by large, most (a few have the intelligence, or perhaps humility not to) of those kingdoms who gangbanged LGC last era, come here crying to the almighty. Having forgotten the position they put LGC in this era, and how the odds were far worse for LGC then than it is for them now, they moan and groan. Of course LGC could still have won the era without overloading with allies, everybody knows that (despite some wanting not to admit it) but hopefully it served as a lesson to those pulled this stunt last era: a taste of their own medicine. You reap what you sow.

That said, we genuinely didn't expect it to be such an easy win. Yes, we were anticipating a win (we do most eras), but no, not such an easy win. BACCUS had bragged a lot last era after their "success", so we expected a much tougher fight from them. Abydos always is a challenge, or we hoped. Then you throw in IE, Zeon, BoW and other kingdoms, who are respected in their own right.

On our end, we had a weakened Legacy. We were down to 17 players (now 16), our allies were DB, who were practically all new to one another with it being a newly formed kingdom of an assortment of players, and as such we weren't expecting all that much from them, but they proved more a success than could have been anticipated. Then there was Mirror, again a kingdom reforming and growing, a kingdom who we like as allies, and more importantly friends. Carnage then came to us about wanting to smash BACCUS before the round started, and so we agreed, and then finally we approached PHI, knowing they were good guys.

We knew some of our allies wouldn't ally each other, so we knew they would fight, meaning our "alliance" wasn't tight with us against all else, and there would be conflict amongst us. What we didn't anticipate was our foes being taken out before that would happen. BACCUS fell quickly and easily, which we didn't expect, and Abydos soon after. Only then did our allies reach one another on the map to fight.

In hindsight, perhaps we did give our enemies too much respect. Is that neccessarily a bad thing, that we respected our enemies prowess? To even suggest we like an easy fight is silly, we are a warring kingdom -- the best in VU. We want a challenge, we tried out new alliances, we tried out a new idea of having a seperate kingdom, we thought we would be weakened sufficiently by it and we anticipated a stronger enemy, with our allies fighting amongst each other before anybody else. We were wrong. We'll learn from it.


03:59:58 May 31st 07 - Mr. Sloth:

As usual, Legacy's diplomacy was the key to their success. Normally it is not acknowledged or as obvious, but this era everyone has gotten it in spades. Well done. There is no one left to challenge you now. Bring on armageddon ;) 


04:09:46 May 31st 07 - Mr. Killstone The Destroyer:

im not done yet iv barley had any action my army was beaten right before we invaded abydos so i had no fun in that i want blood and revenge *makes evil grin and rubs hands together* =D


04:31:52 May 31st 07 - Mr. Fra Gusti:

I agree with Sloth here. Legacy won by diplomacy. The Monks were reduced to 1/2 the Kd of last era. Even with the full team up and running, we would not have had a chance with so many big KDs against us.

Dark Blood has quite a few of legacy...so i dont buy they are a new KD..please.

The truth is that Legacy is at this point a huge number Legacy+Dark Blood, that all the others folks wanted to have an easy era by Napping them, that Abydos surprisingly believed they could remain independent in such a context.

Legacy growing so fast in members is even more destabilizing than the existance of Legacy itself (20-23 players till last era). We are now at 33% of the time for the era...with a long Boring time in front of us.

Too easy to play in a KDs of veterans...with such an easy scenario in getting naps/alliances (everybody of course will tend to nap them).

So unless there is a pre-build big alliance against legacy at the beginning of every era...there will always be a boring era....for sure.

I think in such situation.....better to give people the possibility to play in alternative worlds (and not just Lesser worlds).....at least we are gonna have some fun:). Zeta...think about it....

...otherwise teh only way out of this boredome is to hope teh Legacy players become old and spend less time in VU:)....

and NO there is no altternative for teh rest in becoming more active and better players.....people have their real lives and dont tend to dedicate so much time to just  a game:)!!

About anti-Legacy alliances:)...well.....I personally dont see any potential giving so many leadership profiles i see all around in top KDs:)....soo NO way out in the next 2-4 eras to this boredome...

P.s.: I still dont understand how people that Napped Legacy before the beginning of the era...can be considered top KDs. They just handed over victory to Legacy at that time.....I would not call them exactly the boldest KDs...around....:). Although I have some "issues" with Abydos 3 leaders:)...I think this time they demonstrated some..."balls"...mixed to ingenuity..of course.


08:43:02 May 31st 07 - Mr. Gnadentod:

not whine, wine isteat :)

Lot's of Baccus wine for all here, itis free, my brewery is running again and my wine-sellers are running arround (some almost naked ;) ) again.
Oh and those who dislike wine, I still have good old german beer here :)).

So take a break from this flamewars and chill a round, as long as my brewery exists and forget the world outside,(I fear some lgc anto-wine-fundametalists are allready on their way to close my brewery...... :))) )

cheers


09:12:22 May 31st 07 - Lord Senturu:

*steals all of Gnadentods beer*

ahh good stuff


09:33:44 May 31st 07 - Lord Oya:

For once swifty you told it like it was, for the most part....hopefully though you didn't direct the "but no they winge and whine about it" at us, i haven't cared that we lost (yes it was a little easy, but we have had internal issues) and we have been fighting 5+ since OOP and it doesn't matter who you are, at that stage in the game its tough against that many enemies, troop numbers are all pretty much the same.... The only problem i've had with LGC this era isn't the fact they gangbanged us in some alliance, frankly i don't care, it's quite flattering you would put that much effort into it.... but what i am pieved at is that last era i remember being flamed and moaned at for doing this exact thing by LGC members, so it just seems a tad hypocritical to say some of those things. But it was fun, it rekindled some old flames that i've lost recently....gave me a need to stick around :) Gratz LGC on your win and bring on next era


09:36:50 May 31st 07 - Mr. Haywood Jablowme:

the era does not stop until i say its over!


10:26:03 May 31st 07 - Mr. Gnadentod:

damn, beer allready taken...

"Gustav, Harrald, Edgar, Björn........ stop making wine, we need more beer, QUICKLY"

*to himself* let's look arround who is the drunken bastard who drunk all the beer alone :)


14:19:54 May 31st 07 - Mr. Messiah:

Mr. Dingleberry Dave/Swifty/Whoever

"Having forgotten the position they put LGC in this era, and how the odds were far worse for LGC then than it is for them now, they moan and groan."

Firs of all, I havent heard anyone who is actually an important figure moan about anything. I would like to point out the inclarities and faulty arguments used in this post in my opinion. For example: Nobody put LGC in that position last era. LGC put themselves in it by not NAPing anyone. And the odds where not worse for LGC last era, you owned 1/3 of the map before any of these so called "allies" fired a single arrow in your direction. 

"Furthermore, LGC made several attempts to even the odds at the time, by having some kingdoms back down to make the fight even, but because those kingdoms did not care about "gangbanging" LGC then, they all refused."

To think that they would sign a NAP with you when they already got their armies on your front is folly, especially when they've already NAPed their other neighbours becouse they are taking on the mightiest power on fantasia.

"Of course LGC could still have won the era without overloading with allies, everybody knows that "

"We like a challenge as much as the next kingdom"

When you put these two next to eachother it becomes funny(ohh, and yes we know it) =).. Just wondering, what happened?

"DB, who were practically all new to one another with it being a newly formed kingdom of an assortment of players,"

Correction: an ssortment of the best players.

"In hindsight, perhaps we did give our enemies too much respect. Is that neccessarily a bad thing, that we respected our enemies prowess?"

"We were wrong. We'll learn from it."

I think the actual error you commitet was believeing other kds where allying against you becouse of some big conspiracy. Last era you where ganged up on becouse you didnt have any naps at all and becouse you where winning the era. This era you ganged up with a bunch of the most powerfull before you even knew how the era would turn out. Even if it had been abydos and not you in this alliance the result would have been the same. And just a few facts: there has not been a great alliance against LGC since Serentiy, and eventhough Vendetta was a conspiracy with the aim to beat you it only included very few people. You have a stroke of paranoia to you and you think people treat you differently just becouse of who you are - we dont. To use your own words you "reap what you sow".


14:44:40 May 31st 07 - Lord Oya:

@messiah:


word

15:05:38 May 31st 07 - Mr. Bertrand IN Shame:

i don't like messiah's but, i think he has a point ...

this era we started as strongest and people wanted to kill us for it (aswell as some trouble from previous era's), fair enough ...    but you all know about me,  you do not allie the strongest kd as it needs to be beaten ...  and it's not my fault that it is always the same kd that seems to be on top.

(somehow i feel lucky to have given up on diplomacy some time ago ... all i want is that the kd i'm in wants to take on the best kd's out there, no matter how, no matter when, no matter what the odds are :-p  (probably why i've never done reallyreally good ;-)  )


17:30:50 May 31st 07 - Mr. Jetleeomg:

Oya don't flatter yourself. There was no anti abydos alliance. we would've preferred if Phi hadn't attacked you - would've been more plunders for us. You were pitiful, couldn't even hold a blocker with 25 members.

Messiah, excuse me, but who the feck are you? Do you even play on fantasia?


18:54:10 May 31st 07 - Lord Oya:

lgc members can't take congrats very well it seems :D and i don't remember saying anti-abydos alliance anywhere :)

And w/e you say i dont remember having any blockers :)


19:02:50 May 31st 07 - Sir Fizban:

Messiah did, but had a nice eviction notice against him. ;-)


19:19:10 May 31st 07 - Dark Lord Osiris:

Mr. Jetleeomg

Report


5/31/2007 11:30:50 AM
Oya don't flatter yourself. There was no anti abydos alliance. we would've preferred if Phi hadn't attacked you - would've been more plunders for us. You were pitiful, couldn't even hold a blocker with 25 members.

Messiah, excuse me, but who the feck are you? Do you even play on fantasia?

 

 

next era when our 25 members dont need to fight off to other top 7 kds while trying to finish off 3 others perhaps we can give you a challange. Next era we will give you everything we have. our goal for next era might as well be to crush you :) but as i said last era we want to beat you one on one which is why we DIDNT form alliances.


19:19:29 May 31st 07 - Mr. Messiah:

I have played on Fantasia on and off since beta 2:6. But thats not the point, my points are in my last post.


19:21:44 May 31st 07 - Sir Drunken:

So Messiah who were you back then? Blah?


19:22:43 May 31st 07 - Dark Lord Osiris:

augh or love take your pick


19:24:46 May 31st 07 - Sir Drunken:

oh okie whoever but blah :) cause i still got something against him forgotten what that was tho =D


19:34:42 May 31st 07 - Dark Lord Osiris:

and will you please for christs sake stop saying reap what you soe?

we WERE NOT allied to Carnage Baccus or Only u last era (ive put it in bold because you dont seem to understand it)

we declared war on you and were warring you for a whole week before anyone else did

Your kd (lgc) and its diplomats personally insulted me for that whole week.

your kd (lgc) then decided they wanted to nap us so you could beat baccus.

Why would any sane man accept a nap from someone who has insulted him for a full week. ??


19:41:38 May 31st 07 - Mr. Bertrand IN Shame:

hehehe, lgc-diplomacy doesn't work on every kd  :-p


20:23:38 May 31st 07 - Lord Weirdgrivi The Diplomat:

Mr. Jetleeomg

Report


5/31/2007 7:30:50 PM
Oya don't flatter yourself. There was no anti abydos alliance. we would've preferred if Phi hadn't attacked you - would've been more plunders for us. You were pitiful, couldn't even hold a blocker with 25 members.

Messiah, excuse me, but who the feck are you? Do you even play on fantasia?

 

Dear Mr. Jetleeomg, I will not criticise Legacy on public forums (as it would only mean my diplomatical suicide with all of you so strong, coherent and with an incredible way of "divide et impera" and making it look like you are such good guys with spotless behaviours) but I must say that you are really living in a dream world.

It is only Abydos who can really fill us in on the truth here but from my knowledge, almost every HoH army they had (except 1 or such) was thrown at us and at our blockers. It seemed to me and if I am mistaken, please correct me Oya or Osiris and apologise my lack of humbleness, that when you were making your final approach towards them, they decided to try to take us down with them (no matter the costs), neglecting their northern border where you were expecting restless and hungry.

We managed to hold and then arrived a little later in their core due to other forces still delaying us. I'd say we did the hard work and again, I'm expecting Osiris's or Oya's voice to tell me if I'm mistaken. I apologise if I sound c0cky or arrogant as I realise that my view might be distorted. The outcome of what happened during the town grabbing phase is clear and if you don't know what I'm talking about, ask your vices. (No need to remind me again that this is the way things go, thank you.) This is why I'm confused, what more plunders would you have expected?

Anyway, Messiah did make a good point and if you'd be less arrogant Jet, you wouldn't jump at his neck like you did.. Hell, I've seen playing and he did quite a good job, I'd always have a place for him in Phi, not to mention his experience... Nonetheless, I've hardly seen you, even in eras when we were fighting and I could say (if I'd be following your example) that you are nothing except a guy who brags over creating #VU.

That's all, hope you don't take it as an offense, just a little bit of criticism and me showing my view on things. Nevertheless, I wouldn't be surprised of at least 3 Legacy flames towards me in the next few hours. Hopefully not though XD


21:30:16 May 31st 07 - Lord Oya:

as i have said before weird, we fought everyone around us bar jesters....our armies were men't for you only you are correct there...but we had some hoh armies else where, with all the skirmishing we have done with the smaller kingdoms keeping blockers was difficult when we had to keep you guys under control, Phi will make a fine kingdom...and i hold you guys (bar a few members) in higher stead then alot of VU players, just because atleast you know where you stand with you guys.


21:32:39 May 31st 07 - Mr. Smuff With A Shemale:

:) 'bar a few members'! hehe oh Oya you mean me!! thank you for the recognition :P

 

 


22:06:03 May 31st 07 - Mr. Durza:

Their is however one thing id like to point out... yes use may NAP or ally other kingdoms... but they are never middle sized or small kingdoms its always the likes of carnage and phi... who arn't what you call small kingdoms... maby its time you'se started playing fair... and another thing... yas exploit bug's which is *beep*ing unfair!


22:13:54 May 31st 07 - Ms. Emogirl:

Translation of what durza said  :

There is, however one thing I'd like to point out. Yes,you may NAP or ally other kingdoms. But they are never medium sized or small kingdoms. It's always kingdoms like Carnage or PHI. Who aren't what you can exactly calll small kingdoms. Maybe it's time that you start playing fair. And another thing, You exploited a bug which is *beep*ing unfair.

 

And my response to this : What would LGC win allying small kingdoms?Just less people to kill.


22:18:00 May 31st 07 - Mr. Durza:

What would you win you ask? You'se would win a fair fight, a bit more of a challenge. It wouldn't just be LGC killing every small kingdom. LGC brag about being the best, its time LGC had the ball's to show it and fight a decent fight! What im say'n is why not fight the like's of carnage instead of fighting the smaller kingdoms and ruining it for them.


22:18:12 May 31st 07 - Mr. Dingleberry Dave:

Oh, we NAP and take fledgling kingdoms under wing all the time. Wasn't Mirror only reformed last era (or the era before? Sometime recently anyhow) and very small? We took them in while kingdoms such as BACCUS beat down on them.

Or even the Midnight Sun kingdom, last era. They very incredibly new, too. Once again, we NAPed them and gave them safe haven against all the other kingdoms.

In fact, I'm willing to bet that LGC has taught more new players and small kingdoms than any other kingdom in VU. There goes your "LGC is out to kill the small people!" hypothesis.

Problem is, we can't be everybodys best friend. We can't NAP every small kd you want, nor every medium, or large. We try do what we do in moderation, as I said in my last message. Sometimes its successful, othertimes not. This era we overestimated our enemies and gave them too much respect, hopefully next era we won't. Of course, either way, we're likely to get criticised. It's hard to please everybody, and not everybody can be pleased.

Mr. Durza

Report


5/31/2007 8:18:00 PM
What would you win you ask? You'se would win a fair fight, a bit more of a chalenge. It wouldn't just be LGC killing everysmall kingdom. If you'se brag about being the best, its time LGC had the ball's to show it and fight a decent fight!


We did that last era. Or did you not forget it? We fought the #2, #3, #4 and #5 kds all at the same time, aswell as an assortment of other smaller kingdoms. We put up decent fights, and this era we wanted to teach the other kingdoms a lesson or two about gangbanging. We had it done to us, we did it back to them.


22:36:40 May 31st 07 - Lord Weirdgrivi The Diplomat:

Yes Oya, Osiris's last HoH army was one I didn't see for example.. And I forgot to mention in my earlier post that I (we) acknowledge the fact that things might have been (these implies they might also not have been) a lot different if you wouldn't have fought 3 to 4 other Kingdoms.

Whatever their strength or organisation might be, I'm sure a one-way war is much easier.. Nevertheless, you made the same mistake Legacy did last era. However strong and imba you are, at a certain point quantity will  beat up quality :)

It was a good war (at least for us) cause it kept us connected a lot and not few were the times when chances looked grim. The usual type of war we fight with you guys, hard enough to put us in great peril but easy enough not to get stomped as Legacy usually does..

Also thanks for the compliment and whatever our differences on forums may be, we also are aware of your strength and maybe even underestimated you once or twice ;)

I am curious though, do you admit now that some of your members have used a bug against us more than once? Cause I can see Underhill, Carp and Elite are no longer in Abydos but I have been very upset when I heard that you were denying the fact that it even happened with ZeTa himself confirming it to me :(

P.S. : I know I said I will no longer talk to you but hey... I'm a sensible guy who can't resist to answer a sensible, decent post. And since it's the first I see from you guys directed towards my guys in the last few weeks, I just had to do it XD

P.P.S. : OMG, 4 posts got in during the time it took me to write this lol.
And Gallyon isn't a new player ffs!

 


01:18:22 Jun 1st 07 - Mr. Fra Gusti:

We took them in while kingdoms such as BACCUS beat down on them.

 

WTF...Mirror declared on us...they attacked us!!!!! That's crazy:). Oh well, this speaks about your rationality.



01:25:35 Jun 1st 07 - Lord Weirdgrivi The Diplomat:

True, I remember Adel's post where he was condemning the "drunken monks" and taking it on to himself to make justice :)


01:47:58 Jun 1st 07 - Mr. Shyers The Return:

there is alot of typing it this thread.... i cant't read that much, it makes my head spin and then i can't take over the world : )

did someone say i was one of the best players? thx Messiah, i love you too. but i really tend to disagree with you, i'm a sucky player and i'm just back after missing 5 eras, so i sucky sucky even more that usual.


01:53:22 Jun 1st 07 - Mr. Adelbert:

@ Fra Gusti

You attacked us first, but we did the decleration official. =)

@ Weirdgrivi The Diplomat

The drunken monks are evil!!!! ;D


03:33:58 Jun 1st 07 - Mr. Fra Gusti:

@ Fra Gusti

You attacked us first, but we did the decleration official. =)

That's absolutely false....but not relevant anymore.


03:40:18 Jun 1st 07 - Mr. Haywood Jablowme:

It is true.  shut up fra


05:16:01 Jun 1st 07 - Lord Senturu:

*hits adelbert*

hey i was a drunken monk. and im not evil!!!!


07:12:40 Jun 3rd 07 - Mr. Adelbert:

No rly fra
u attacked fuirs6=)


10:45:58 Jun 3rd 07 - Mr. William II:


we did? hmmmm funny


10:25:12 Jun 4th 07 - Mr. Gnadentod:

The first fights last era between Mirror and Baccus:

It was done bey ex-Freedom fighter player Saphira who attacked ex holy Flame players, who joined Baccus.

Saphira would have been wiped out and flet to Mirror, so we from Baccus didn't attacked her.
Then She went out to attack Holy Fire player, meanwhile they joined.
But then Saphira didn't stop the attack, us Baccus did with her.
No she attacked new players from Baccus and signatured with these action her own throw out from new Baccus terrain.
Soon after, Mirror declared war and started to sent weak armies toward our walls.... the war started.


19:37:16 Jun 6th 07 - Mr. William II:


agreed... i still remember they attacked our southern walls and we needed some troops there, they were overthrown and pushed back into the abyss


10:57:14 Jun 9th 07 - Mr. Hemmer:

Fantasia is *beep*!


[Top]  Pages:  (back) 1 2 

Login
Username: Don't have an account - Sign up!
Password: Forgot your password - Retrive it!

My bookmarksOld forum design


- close -
  Copyright © 1999-2024 Visual Utopia. All rights reserved. Page loaded in 0.03 seconds. Server time: 1:00:22 AM