Forums / In game politics / World Wars Era 42

There is no such thing as a MINOR nap breach. You either keep your word or you do not. Like I just said , Honour is not about how you act when you are being watched or when you are at your weakest, anyone can be honourable then , true honour is how you act when you have no reason to act honourably. No pulse epic failed that and then your alliance did as well.

It doesnt matter if me taking the city was "under bad curcumstances" the Nap breach didnt occur at that point. WHAT DID THE NAP SAY? you know, the one whose terms your leader wrote and agreed to? Was I compensated after YOUR player broke the nap or was I told "

Mr. Zerocool (10/16/2009 1:26:09 AM)
i havent been able to read your leaders confirmation till few hours ago. so the nap was made official by the time i read the confirmation. not before it. take the city and this means the nap is void. remember, you guys asked for the nap, not us." LMAO, you cant have it both ways, if we did not have a nap would I have removed 100k archies from the city and left starta? you have the balls to argue that "it was no big deal" except that it was, you gave your word as a kingdom and then broke it as a kingdom, that means more than you might think. and all you had to do to retain your kingdoms good name was apologise for a mistake and compensate someone for breaking your word. Period. You now Attack Edd for attacking but YOU HAVE NO NAP, he was negotiating with you in good faith and you guys dropped the ball. Edd has kept his word with us even when he didnt have to, a few days ago No pulse had backstabbed us, they blitzed several unprotected cities and pretty much wiped out a few players who were fighting on another world (as per our agreement with No pulse LOL) DESPITE US HAVING AN AGREEMENT several of you defended their actions by saying we brought it on ourselves LMAO.  Now at the same time Edd had a guy who wnated to go through our blocker but WE COULDNT OPEN THEM DUE TO A NAP WE SIGNED it would have given them a clear path to an allies core. Did Edd break the nap? (and according to some of the idiots on here it would have been"acceptable" to do so) No he didnt, even when it would have meant a hige advantage to his kingdom and even when some of the tards on here would have stuck up for him to do it. the only thing that prevented him from doing it was simple, HE GAVE HIS WORD. WHATS SAD IS THAT MORE PEOPLE DON'T THINK THAT WAY.

Mr. Ezatous



Report


23:42:10 Sep 20th 09 rev are gonna trample all u noobs
--


Indeed I will, after Im done with your mummy Swift :)

So, small infact, being a troll, i think i can stamp on you.

Nah I like hearts for the most part, even palp has chnaged his ways but I like being in crazy. btw in case you havent noticed the whole nap breaking thing did bite you in the ass. when i came to starta I was open about my reason for being there I warned you guys then attacked as we had no relations. its a bit different when we have a nap and your guy takes the city and then you make excuses after the fact. im done talking about it, everyone knows now anyway.

Sort of like your timing where your leadership decided it was ok to break a nap with crazy because we were too busy dealing with no pulse to do anything?

Pot meet kettle, difference being WE HAD A NAP.

Blah, Blah, Blah, wine wine wine.

Unhonorable, thats all I see from both of you. Even if we weren't letting anyone thru, the only one Edd tried to contact was ME, not even a vice.

So, you jackballs broke the nap by attacking, therefore, kingdom hearts = unhonorable.

*Yawn* next please.

umm karac i contacted Drakos and zeracool.

"Yes, i've noticed this tactics and timing you speak off. Your tactics seem to be to break a NAP and attack an unprotected area of fat juicy mines, when our large armies are elsewhere. The timing you speak of is very near the end of the era where their will be no time to destroy you. Yes, tactics and timing, your right."

um i have taken 1 city of like 100 homes lol on valhalla and killed two scouts and are moving to take the cities you took off crazy in valhalla. now i do also have an army enroute to starta but that army was the same army i was trying to get to fanta and i wasnt anticipating war with it just defence of my fanta cities.

so your comments arent really relevant to me.

but the question is...why WOULDNT you open the blockers to a nap partner when a) our intention was to pass through to fanta b) we had no enemies on starta or fanta so there was no risk of us using it to attack another nap partner of yours.

no pulse opened their blockers on manta to allow me to get through to fanta, a route which is considerably longer and requires more organization to get through . but they did it. forgetting the terms of the nap that allowed us access anyway, since you now want to deny them except for Edd, the simple fact is you were being pig headed and unfriendly by not opening the blockers in this situation. both surprise and myself marched rather large slower armies for more than 2 real days towards starta to go through to fanta. with the era nearly over we needed to get our troops through the already agreed route.

the only conclusions can be that a) phi were arrogant enough to think that we would put up with it(not opening the blocker as per pre agreeance)or b) didnt care if we warred or c) wanted war.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2S2ZFpoD9sE">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2S2ZFpoD9sE" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350">

how newb can bad kitty be?

well i invite all kingdoms here to post on this question.

1.) if your enemy says you have a nap and for you to stop attacking, WILL YOU STOP? when your leaders didnt say that the nap has been made official?

2.) if you havent recieved a confirmation of the NAP, or havent read it. would that mean you are napped with that kd?

3.) if we are at war, i send you terms of a nap without both agreeing on it. does that mean we are napped?

this guys is so stupid, not even the most stupid child who knows nothing can be like him

whew, im glad im not like him =)