Mr. Fordius Report 2/27/2009 10:04:00 PM

Killstone that's a lie :) you know it. I presume the first 1 was E. than the second one was Foundation. but you guys had a nap with Predators too ( even more than that ) so its defenitly more than that also dont forget about the naps on other maps :) we were fighting on mantrax and fantasia and we didnt back off from any battle and kept our promise about real wars :) maybe we lost the battle for now but teh war is far from over. if we had done the same thing you guys did and nap all others the outcome of our 2 battles would be different its just how you look @ it. You claim RET being the best while I can disagree with that. and no I'm not claiming that RVL is the best either. I'm just disagreeing with you that RET is the best. as they havent proven to be good ( besides allying up all other good kd's )

Ok fordius first of all i never said Ret was the best. in all honosty i didnt think we could beat RVL we only won because of diplomacy. and throughout VU history there have been better kingdoms than ret.

second of all. i said in the beggining we had peaceful relations with two kingdoms we did not NAP preds until we were already activly warring and attacking RVL.

and third and lastly I personally am not a fan of mass NAPs then farming. but IMO ret did not do that. Us and RVL were big targets to almsot every kingdom. We knew RVL would be a great opponent and so we took precautionary actions to aid us in the war. RVL did not. because of this RVL got overwhelmed and ended up losing their wars. Ret thrived and is now the main target for all kingdoms.

i do not think that RET is the best and i do not think RET over NAPed i think we had to make choices and NAP a lot of kingdoms but we are also warring a lot of kingdoms on a lot of fronts.

0

We shall do, ignore you.

^
| ______ rhymes :-p

Lol yet again people claiming that RVL did something wrong.
we stated even before we started with this kingdom that we were planning on a none nap policy.

and if you ask around to all the other leaders that contacted us even lewatha.
I've said in the start that if we also napped all the big kd's what fun there would be if all the big kd's nap and attack the smallers. so I said we will fight the bigger kd's to balance out and we did you think we couldnt get up allies to war RET.

so dont blame it on our Diplomacy as its chosen for a certain purpose and that was to balance out the other kd's napping each other.

Also I kinda find it odd ois.
as nobody ever claimed anything about RVL being good I've always denied that but ah well you for some reason seem to need to attack.

Velocity was our friendly kd where stashed some new guys to test.
but that plan did go wrong ( yet again ) you can make mistakes as we are new I'm totally not unhappy with it.

And Killerstone your wrong the time you guys napped/mapped Preds you guys werent winning the war only attacking.

cause as far as I knew your merger got bounched back.
in the meanwhile Pred was allready attacking from the western side.
go ask them so your wrong anyways like I said.

I'm totally not unhappy even when we lost the battle we did pretty well without the nap policy :) fighting off the bigger kd's in vu :) and we've learn some new stuff so no worries ;)

I wasn't actually having a niggle at RVL at all
Just replying to

Demonslayer Scientist Report 2/28/2009 7:38:13 AM	I wonder how many KDs RVL NAPed...?
Sir Penguin Report 2/28/2009 8:33:02 AM	0

So cool down your penor Ford :)

Oh, but we cherish our scouts and we bring full revenge to our scout killers.
I recomend you make another graveyard for your troop, as this one is full.

we NAPed... all of fantasia... last era...

Well... We only warred LGC  and dark OOP than moved on to Vengeance which we fought at the same time as we fought FATE.... well yes... I'm sure we NAPed all of fantasia last era...

"And Killerstone your wrong the time you guys napped/mapped Preds you guys werent winning the war only attacking."

ok fordius as you seem to not know how to read i will make the key words big and easy for you to read.

i said at the BEGGINING of the era (as in before OOP) we had TWO NAPS fate and E. E died OOP. we fought and killed rebirth. then we fought and killed fraternity. then we NAPed preds while we fought and klilled velocity and fought RVL on two fronts (in the area near us). i NEVER EVER said we NAPed preds when we were WINNING against RVL we naped preds because we needed to make sure we didnt get a fourth front and become overwhelmed.

and its not my fault that RVL decided to go no NAPs thats their own fault so dont use it as an excuse casue i think tis bad diplomacy. you dont have to NAP the top kingdoms on the map maybe one good NAP and one or two smaller ones to defend your flanks. then you can fight the rest which is what ret did. we just have lots of flanks and lots of wars

haven't responded about who we NAPed on fantasia last era and who we fight...

does ne1 know some1 named Gabe from maine?

I believe it was Fant players that said that even if you have a higher power % on lower worlds than Fant KDs, it means nothing unless you are on Fant. Saying that just because their power is higher than yours combined is just an excuse to make yourself look better.

lol he meant me, not the kd dark

Mr. Sanoh Report 2/28/2009 3:40:59 PM

I believe it was Fant players that said that even if you have a higher power % on lower worlds than Fant KDs, it means nothing unless you are on Fant. Saying that just because their power is higher than yours combined is just an excuse to make yourself look better.

true but most if not all of the remainnig starta kingdoms are kingdoms who have fought and survived on fant before (H preds BOW)

I am saying that because we moved large armies away from our core (where you have towns - including armories), knowing we have a NAP with you, so we dont need to protect against you

he he he - maybe that was the reason you killed my scouts early in the era - I was just passing though

Glad...I allow no scouts in or around our core...friend or foe...

And Asriel.... you got punished for not being curtious and planting a city where you felt right. When you enter another persons territory, at least have the curtiousy to ASK where you can place a city, so that you dont do the NUBB thing and place one where its gonna cost someone else there income. And TBH, I dont even remember that, but you are a klutz anyway.

you attack friendly scouts? -.-"

And how can it possibly cost you income if he places a city in your core.? <.<

i want milk ;(

about the CF time Glad, it was not officially stated but since we lost most of our presence at Fant...it happened anyway. I waited more than 72h to start moving things around at Fant thinking on that.

But i do agree we could have officialized it.

Sir Penguin Report 3/1/2009 9:36:18 AM

i want milk ;(

iv got plenty of white stuff for you

it seem ret won

The army you click on is no longer here!

uh oh

I'm sorry Ruby, but that small merge of Heaven was utterly destroyed..

i wonder how that happened, bamse was on the hoh, and they had way more troops then you, 60 k more

even then, sheer number of gaia can get you there =)  (bored at the end of era 36...I tried lol)

do not underestimate teh retributionists!

(though I had nothing to do with this attack :P)