Forums / Questions and Answers / Most fearsome methodology
Most fearsome methodology | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
18:16:07 Aug 23rd 17 - Mr. Bigfield The Auditor: Can someone explain the rankings?
| ||||
18:35:46 Aug 23rd 17 - Woody (Mr. Woodeh): Clippers troops killed may have been higher quality. Fot example killing 100 naz is more points than killing 100 gaia in the most fearsome. | ||||
19:25:35 Aug 23rd 17 - Princess Aisha: Actually its not Its some kind of formula (Battles won x certain number) + (cities taken x certain number) + troops killed. | ||||
20:16:50 Aug 23rd 17 - Woody (Mr. Wooodeehh): Under that logic aisha if troops had the same value he should be above clipper? | ||||
20:32:50 Aug 23rd 17 - Princess Aisha: Now that they have samo amount of battles and cities taken Looks like it was changed, because I've never seen this before
| ||||
03:01:30 Aug 24th 17 - Senturu (Lord Forge): Troop type/level matter, if you kill 100k swords you get bodies, but if you kill 25k Axemen you get bodies, and points. | ||||
23:55:49 Aug 24th 17 - Mr. Bigfield The Auditor: I think cities muat be weighted more than anythibg.
| ||||
00:08:27 Aug 25th 17 - Arkantos (Lord Ajax): I believe building count is also in the equation. As well as peasants. Even though peasants are not calculated in troop kill count. Troop losses might also affect this. | ||||
11:24:12 Aug 25th 17 - Endless (Mahatma Gandhi): cities captured, then troops killed
| ||||
[Top] Pages: 1 |
My bookmarksOld forum design