Forums / Questions and Answers / Question Switching Kds

are you kidding me? Only since ever!

unfortunately acting unhonorble seems to be the most fashionable thing to do on vu now

When your entire kd but you and 2 others becomes inactive i think thatd be legal so long as you dont attack your former mates. Active or not. Otherwise itll probally make you feel ill on the inside. I know i did when Newbie became pretty  much inactive. Had to join a cause worth living. Dishounerable, yes very. Neccesary, yes if i wanted a competitive advantage. Though now im dead anyways but i have learned quite a bit.

I think there are instances when you can switch kd's in mid era but I am also highly against it. When I join a KD, unless I promise one full era, I mean I will fight my hardest with that kd until I and the rest of the kd die in a war and end up having to restart. I also give them warning if thats the case. But thats really the only time I think its ok to leave a kd in mid-era. I hate true traitors ><

There are more factors that play into the whole changing kds in mid era.  Like the first kd the leaders start to do dishonorable acts.  Say canceling naps or maps just because they want easy targets close to there cities.  Also the fact of being forced to join the first kd with the threat of death.  If you find a better kd and they are willing to take you in i say go for it.  But leave just because of lossing or the other kd looks more promising is traitorise and you must die.

I'm just talking about Crazy who decided to steal a ROC member in Midgard just because he had the biggest army (which is weak, tbh) and attack his allies. Either way, I was gna get attacked but its disgusting to see him attack his former teammates, all of whom are new :\

Then you wonder where the new players are going? Hmm..

Leaving your Kd in the middle of the era is NEVER acceptable or, using the word you all love to fling about, "Honourable".
And ROC is an active Kd so don't bother using that excuse :)

Its the principle of the matter!
That little girl can't touch me... can't even scratch me... but the fact he backstabbed all you new members is just sad. Especially with no valid reason... Most other first era players aren't so "understanding" :\

Wait till you see me in a bad mood ;)
Heh, good luck with VU and tell me if ya need something though Teirdel :)

Lord Wraith The Inactive Report 15:23:40 Oct 22nd 09

I'm just talking about Crazy who decided to steal a ROC member in Midgard just because he had the biggest army (which is weak, tbh) and attack his allies. Either way, I was gna get attacked but its disgusting to see him attack his former teammates, all of whom are new : Then you wonder where the new players are going? Hmm..

I did hear about that and I was rather disappointed in how things were.  Probably one of the only disappointing things for me this era.  Just from an observers point of view.  Then again, Arch Shade is about as trustworthy(from past experience) as a fox in a chicken coop...I remember a multi incident on Zeta when he tried infiltrating Predators(I think?) while his other account was in The Gauls(?). 

Arch Shade = Hellish Holly = Krizmn

Ahhhhhhhhhh
Arch Shade is that little girl?? No wonder He/she is so bad :)

meh usually its the case if someone switches they are not governed by any NAP or relations formed by the kd he joins so basically he is free game until he reaches an understanding with the attacking forces. Always the case for my kingdoms and most i deal with

RoC was this era.  He was in Gauls and Predators in the era I was in RIP and you were in Gruumsh.  Does Kev not love you anymore? :(

I guess I'll worry about what Wraith and anyone else thinks of Crazy when I get my give a damn fixed  :D

wraith none the less you are always welcome with roc. Krizmn was forming relations? I had no idea...though that might explain quite a few of the backstabs this era. However in his defense he did pick me up and teach me how to play the game, he hasnt done too many admirable things, however I still have to have loyalty to my mentor and stick up for him. He is lenient and a good individual once you get to know him. He also is active, probally one of the reasons i got along with him so when we were in newbie. I admit i too was dishonorable leaving newbie, as was everyone else despite what they say. It was inactive pretty much so we ...er what is the word.....joined, annexed, idk into roc. From there tbh i believe it was temporary for some members an permanent for others. I myself plan to stick with rock all through next era, i beleive Elite does as well. Krizmn made a different choice from us, and no matter how dishonorable it may appear the entire band of Newbie warlords including myself have committed a foule deed. I do not see why this one should be different. Sorry if i am lacking in knowledge, it is my first era and well due to that I wasnt allowed to interfere with politics. (For good reason too..had no idea of that the rivalries in the game would be so feirce, kinda nice though tbh).

Maybe just another way to stick it to Crazy. Some just hate us because they can. LOL

Mr.Krizmn


you scare meh



*skips off*

Mr. Krizmn Report 20:43:40 Oct 22nd 09

Charley is a biased mod and should rarely be taken seriously.

Biased mod? Says who? You? Pathetic.  Rarely taken seriously? Do you really want to test me? Who is your source that I am biased? Stewie maybe? LOL You are a joke with that one post...carry on...

EDIT - There are FAR more people on VU who would say I am one of the better mods while there is that small minority of people who think all mods are evil and biased.  Those people are the ones who post insulting/offtopic/junk posts and have them deleted, then turn around and go "Wtf happened to my post! Dam biased mods are out to get me!"

d'oh :P  It'll be hard stealin' her if I get her name wrong eh... ah well, sh*t happens, off to chasing Megan Fox again . >.>

Biased Mod = A moderator who deletes posts of people he hates, bans people just because they annoy him, etc.  I have done nothing biased.  Just because I am a mod and expressed my opinion on the same world at the time doesn't mean im a "biased mod" it means I expressed my opinion as a player. 
You can say "Wait, you didn't know that this really happened, etc etc etc and that it was all a misunderstanding.  You don't know the full story." or be like "Yeah, I learned from my mistakes and I have turned over a new leaf.  That happened way in the past and im better than that."

But just because im a mod doesn't mean I have to act all official all of the time...I like being a player and a poster as well :|

If im acting as a moderator, I normally post a picture of a kitten and say "Moderator kitteh as disaproved ur submishin"

Oh I did not mean to call you a "corrupt mod".

The reason that your statements are taken so seriously is cause you are a mod and also a player.  Thus much of what you say will be taken as fact, and with little questioning. 

Watching what you post is much more crucial and important than the average player.

I never knew you had issues with being called biased due to deleting posts and such as I have yet to experience these punishments from you.  I am merely replying to statements that you made directly about me as a mod/player.

psst

Ima girl I has no beefs

You're not really chasing me.  I joined Crazy and didn't realize you guys were going to war them.  I had all my troops elsewhere, assuming my core was fine to the east.  Which of course was my mistake. 

90% of my cities were taken before I could turn my armies around.  So with little time left on the era, and just said screw it and went to attack something else rather than fight over my razed cities in a worthless effort.

Like I said, it was my fault.  I did not read the forums.  I didn't take this era that seriously.  I started really late and on Midgard at that.  You guys rushed a late starting world that has been ravished by other kingdoms from other world.

Don't expect to gain any glory.  You guys got free cities.