Forums / In game politics / Kingdom DARK recruiting.

Kingdom DARK recruiting.
07:04:53 Dec 3rd 09 - Duke Ryan The Laughing Storm:

Mr Elit,
We did honour our nap, unfortunately someone in your kingdom did not and when we spoke to your leader the justification for breaking the nap was given as thus.....
"Pirate Suqah (12/2/2009 8:24:01 PM) 
It's also a breach of the NAP with PHI to have opened Neo Dumbleshine for you, I repeatedly repeated that.

So now you're even with them."

actually the building of walls in neo was the third breach of our nap with Domination as our nap clearly forbade this. opening gates TWICE to Kobuskan was unacceptable, once may be a mistake but twice was not.

We are not competing with Phi to see who can get you to break your nap with us the most, simply put I do not care if you break your nap with our enemy (although I do not like the breaking of any nap as it devalues ones word). Your leader was contacted regarding the breach and was more interested in justifying it then apologising and compensating. Therefore we declared war. It was not personal it is how we will be dealing with any Nap partner who breaks their word to us multiple times.



07:06:40 Dec 3rd 09 - Pirate Suqah:

In other words :

About 3 days ago, Cullwhch demanded a blocker be opened so he could defend his city from PHI. To do this, he brought up a term in our NAP which said we were not allowed to build blockers between Dark and their enemies.

We hadn't built the blocker for that particular reason, but we built it to keep BoW+Rebirth out, though Cullwhch kept on moaning, so I ordered it to be opened, resulting in Kobuskan's army being smacked.

About an hour later, I received a message from Kobuskan that it was a NAP breach to open blockers for an enemy of PHI. Which I knew, but whatever decision I made, it would have been a NAP breach. Kobaskan however, decided to let it go.

Yesterday, Kobuskan demanded a blocker be opened, and brought up the exact same term, Cullwhch used earlier. Since I opened it last time for Cullwhich, I could impossibly neglect this request for the exact same thing from Kobuskan, so I agreed, so you guys were even, and I told both of you no more blockers would be opened.


07:16:15 Dec 3rd 09 - Duke Ryan The Laughing Storm:

No what Cullwych brought up was you not building walls in a city between us and our other cities.  his city was there first so your city building walls in the first place was a breach in our nap as it limited his access to his own city to reinforce it. This was a clear term in our nap.

I do not care what your nap terms are with Phi, I do not care if you thought you were being "fair" by breaching our nap. You breached OUR nap not once but twice by opening to Kobuskan and again by building the walls in Neo in the first place. Cullwych spoke to you and you showed no inclination to simply admit fault and compensate so we declared war. we would have been willing to city trade had you even attempted a negotiation but you decided on this course instead.


07:44:42 Dec 3rd 09 - Pirate Suqah:

This was an unsolvable situation without breaking a single NAP. So to make it fair I broke both of them. PHI did not make an issue out of it, but you did.

The first time, I admit, was our fault, well, Revenge's fault, but meh...

But this was truly unsolvable. That you don't care about PHI's NAP with us is your problem, we do. And PHI did show respect when we laid the situation in front of them when we had to open the blocker for Cullwhch the first time, I guess you do not.
We built that blocker to defend from BoW+Rebirth, not to block you off. We opened for Cullwhch when he DEMANDED it to be opened. Now we open it for the exact same term in the NAP with PHI for Kobuskan, and you declare war.


07:54:29 Dec 3rd 09 - Psycho Delic Retarded Faux Nouveau:

PHI stated they would attack anyone who NAPed us so they should break their NAP with you anyway.  I understand your situation and I hope you understand ours.  We like Domination but your relations with PHI are hard to work around. 

I think Domination has behaved fairly and blame PHI for any problems.  I blame PHI for our problems with Ravage too.  but upon further reflectiong it all comes back to Ryan.  He is responsible for everything. 

I gave him permission to attack PHI last era so actually I am to blame and I accept that. 


08:21:42 Dec 3rd 09 - Mr. Boombastic:

well, considering dark have been agressively attacked all era and their cities are pretty much cornered by these attackers, i can't actually see how this war declaration would benefit them. So I would disagree they have done this for free cities and that it is more about honour.

that may be foolhardy given their current situation and its a shame it couldn't be resolved amicably but  breaches are breaches and you have to respect them for that.


08:35:21 Dec 3rd 09 - Mr. Elit:

Basically Dark BREAK NAP with asking us for open block. Terms say clear blocks will stay closed and cant be open for attack NAP-Partners. PHI is our nap partner. Its not our fail you decide to set "alone" colony in hostile place with PHI. When you 'accept" for normal Dark to can pass our block for fight with Phi army you need to accept reverse for normal too. Here cant be DOUBLE standards!

This is pure fail-start for Dark diplo. Don't be surprised if incoming eras other KDs use this for reason to make same vs you.


10:17:44 Dec 3rd 09 - Psycho Delic Retarded Faux Nouveau:

exactally boomtastic, 

I killed one scout.  Not interested in getting free cities but in pointing out PHI challanged us and claimed they would fight Ryan & Palpy and all who NAP them.  The arguement that PHI forced Domination to open makes me want to kill PHI more.  Guys in my kingdom complain about Dom's breech then I say don't worry but it happens again so I jsut don't want t olook bad to my followers again.

The whole era I was telling them not to attack Ravage we were friends and to be made to eat my words again just pisses me off.  Actually what the heck we may as well fight rebirth and LH's too.  we aren't choosy.


12:33:40 Dec 3rd 09 - Pirate Suqah:

All Domination members, even vices, stay out of this.


15:54:10 Dec 3rd 09 - Duke Ryan The Laughing Storm:

All Dark members feel free to post your opinion even if it conflicts with mine.

The bottom line is very simple, we stay out of peoples relations with other kingdoms, you wont see us saying we declare war on anyone napped with Phi, but you also wont see us say "hey you broke a nap with someone else so its ok to break ours."

Your entire point is moot, one thing in our nap that is very clear is that each nap partner cannot block a nap partner from their own ciities by placing a new city. so the city that blocks Cullwych even having walls is a breach, Phi cant use that against you because its not even supposed to have walls, so them DEMANDING that another blocker be opened because of it should have resulted in you telling them to pound sand for 3 reasons.

1- They are not your boss so demanding anything is lame unless its a true nap breach not a manufactured one. if anything you should have contacted us immediately, what you did instead was underhanded.

2- it has nothing to do with our relations as a matter of fact I would have given you permission to build that city in clear breach of the nap HAD I EVEN BEEN ASKED, on the condition that it be opened for us as required or that you trade a city so we could avoid it entirely.  We are always reasonable with allies.

3- Phi stated very clearly that ANY  kingdom napping Us would be attacked anyway, now we all know Phi is full of it and really only meant to scare and bully smaller alliances but the fact remains it was stated very clearly.


16:45:21 Dec 3rd 09 - Pirate Suqah:

What you are saying is hypocritical. I'm sure you agree that I had to open for Cullwhch so he could reinforce his city, yet when PHI asks for the exact same blocker to be opened for the exact same NAP term, you say it's not allowed?

Your point 3 is totally not relevant to this conversation either.

You are not showing yourself reasonable allies if we need to ask you if we can make a blocker every blocker we make. I remain of the opinion that there was nothing Domination could have done otherwise in this situation, and that it was just a misfortunate situation.


17:05:46 Dec 3rd 09 - Duke Ryan The Laughing Storm:

Its not even remotely hypocritical Pirate and its obvious to anyone not trying to justify a breach.

1- the city should not have been built in the first place, I refer back to our nap which states very clearly not to add walls to citties built between us and our own cities(im not saying anything about blocking off an enemy although that is in the clause as well.).

2-  of course I dont expect you to contact us before building every blocker, that was a ridiculous statement menat to make us sound unreasonable, I do however fully expect that when breaching a nap you would contact us.

3-if you had bothered to contact Dark leadership before breaching the nap we may have been more open to negotiation but seriously the manner in which you breached the nap was underhanded and now its all about justifying so you don't have to pay compensation. and making it look less dishonourable. I can honestly say I have not one single message either warning us that you were going to breach or letting us know that " hey im letting a huge enemy army through because they DEMANDED that I do so."

 

let me enlighten you

things Dark is responsible for

- NOT breaking agreements with any of our allies

-ensuring that our members dont break agreements even inadvertantly

-if an agreement is broken then compensating the aggrieved ally quickly and fairly.

Things Dark is NOT responsible for

-our allies breaking agreements with our enemies.

-ensuring that people outside our kingdom keep their word

-making sure that if an ally breaches a nap with an enemy that we allow the same ally to breach a nap with us JUST TO MAKE SURE ITS FAIR. lol WHO ARE YOU TRYING TO KID?

is that clear enough for you?


17:13:32 Dec 3rd 09 - Duke Ryan The Laughing Storm:

and again, NEGOTIATION means you give a little and we give a little, your idea of negotiation is to not admit fault and then basically tell us to go screw ourselves because you only broke the nap because you felt it was fair. LMAO.

  You had several options and YOU chose to try and bluster it out with justifications.

 

I don't get it, you are supposed to be intelligent ,yet having seen how we dealt with No honour and Phi breaching agreements did you honestly think we would suddenly turn into people who would simply quietly accept this simply because we are in dire straits and warring several people?


17:24:32 Dec 3rd 09 - Pirate Suqah:

Okay, I tried doing this the nice way.

1- the city should not have been built in the first place, I refer back to our nap which states very clearly not to add walls to citties built between us and our own cities(im not saying anything about blocking off an enemy although that is in the clause as well.).

I'm sorry, but we don't like enemy armies walking through our core, so we build blockers. It's not our problem you build cities on OUR front-line.

2-  of course I dont expect you to contact us before building every blocker, that was a ridiculous statement menat to make us sound unreasonable, I do however fully expect that when breaching a nap you would contact us.



6 No building in eachother's territories, unless agreed upon by the vices/monarchs of both kingdoms.

Recognise this term? Now I could be bitching over quite a few cities built in our territory on fant (dark heaven, theos fant, iseeyou, ...) however I am not. Why? Because NAP's are give and take. Not all rules can always be abbided. Why was I not warned of the cities being made there on fantasia? It says you have to message me to settle a city in our core, yet I received no message.

If I wanted, I could have cried NAP breach a long time ago. But I didn't.

3-if you had bothered to contact Dark leadership before breaching the nap we may have been more open to negotiation but seriously the manner in which you breached the nap was underhanded and now its all about justifying so you don't have to pay compensation. and making it look less dishonourable. I can honestly say I have not one single message either warning us that you were going to breach or letting us know that " hey im letting a huge enemy army through because they DEMANDED that I do so."

 Exactly what Cullwhch DEMANDED to be let through the city in the first place with an army the same size.




-making sure that if an ally breaches a nap with an enemy that we allow the same ally to breach a nap with us JUST TO MAKE SURE ITS FAIR. lol WHO ARE YOU TRYING TO KID?

--> cry me a river Ryan, Kobuskan demanded the exact same thing that Cullwhch demanded a while ago. And now that you guys lost a city, you're going all Q_Q .





Luckily the dark leader is more reasonable and understands our situation. So the problem has been resolved and I shall make no more replies about this subject.


17:27:26 Dec 3rd 09 - Pirate Suqah:

and I did give your leader my apologies btw.


17:49:26 Dec 3rd 09 - Duke Ryan The Laughing Storm:

Just to be clear, Dark is led by two people atm in case you thought I was simply a vice. I will discuss with Psycho when I get home.


15:25:37 Dec 4th 09 - Psycho Delic Retarded Faux Nouveau:


16:54:40 Dec 13th 09 - Psycho Delic Retarded Faux Nouveau:

Sir Black Heart



Report


14:44:46 Dec 13th 09
To all Crazy / Dark members who whine in here, prove ur lies on the map maybe people will believe you. The only thing you are good at is whining on the forums but really you are good for nothing in game.

That's all you did this era, Crazy switching blockers, disbanding and joining other kingdoms, mass merging to get more members maybe u would scare ppl with your numbers and not quality of playing and finally disbanding and wasting all the good members u had and pretending to be weak again. Self pity all era long!

I dare you to see one man in your kingdom. Show me yourself on the map and I promise you our Amazon chicks will be the ones to take you out completely.

I had some respect for you Ryan and Landro when I left crazy but after what I have seen from you this era, I have no respect for you at all. You have not finished up a single fight till the end and all you do is talk.

Let your talk save you this time.
our lies? did we scare you? should I close my gates then?  heh,  yeah I had some respect for you when you left too.  It has since diminished.


20:56:36 Dec 13th 09 - Dr. Happy Pants:

Why would you scare us. This is a game!


02:04:41 Dec 14th 09 - Psycho Delic Retarded Faux Nouveau:

it is quoted from your leader, "maybe u would scare ppl with your numbers".  ask him.


21:42:53 Dec 18th 09 - Mr. Observerjoe:

"MY word is very important to me and I wont compromise it over a shitty free online game."

lol.


[Top]  Pages:  (back) 1 2 

Login
Username: Don't have an account - Sign up!
Password: Forgot your password - Retrive it!

My bookmarksOld forum design


- close -
  Copyright © 1999-2024 Visual Utopia. All rights reserved. Page loaded in 0.03 seconds. Server time: 4:29:38 AM