RoC era of Cowards

RoC era of Cowards

02:54:46 Apr 2nd 10 - Duke Kevdwayne:

Sir Burninglegion The Vengeful

Report

20:48:05 Apr 1st 10 Kev no its not one city, it is 5 citys so far, and we had not once prep'd once the deal was finalized
meant to post that, not the fear one

02:55:50 Apr 2nd 10 - Mr. Teirdel:

Bl, We have had multiple problems with your armies remaining on our blockers after cease fire. Also we have had more than a few questions asking if we could attack after 36 hours. In our eyes it was tech. over and the war was suppose to continue. Your troops even remained in blockers and were reinforced. However we were currently focused on another front. We just got done with that front and in our eyes you were an enemy. So we attacked.

Surely you can see the misunderstanding and the difference in opinions if you read above. Some say you made a mistake in your choice of vocab and some say it was our fault cause of misinterpretation. personally it was both faults due to half @ss diplo. Both parties are at fault.

As for path on the other hand how would you know what RoC would be thinking? Honestly our members were asking on the forums constantly if the 36 hour was up to return the attack. To assume what others think is pure ignorance at its best :). Im sure we all can admit we have made mistakes.

Roc party thought 36 hour break then continued war, Anti thought 36 hour notice.

Poor choice in Vocabulary

Poor communication

Parties already with high animosity.

Bl i wouldnt mind remaining on good terms however you must also see as to what i am trying to say. It was a mistake on both parties. In the future lets clarify and if need be contact myself and i will personally contact a vice first hand the with the exact intended terms. though lets clarify them. After all i think me and yourself could get along.

Though ill probally get in trouble for above post. hehe

03:04:10 Apr 2nd 10 - Sir Burninglegion The Vengeful:

Teirdel your the reason i put except a handful of roc players... your one of the honest ones in your kingdom, it was great fighting your epic pure knight armies

03:09:37 Apr 2nd 10 - Mr. Selos:

Your troops even remained in blockers and were reinforced. However we were currently focused on another front. We just got done with that front and in our eyes you were an enemy. So we attacked.

our forces left the blocker to the last man we merged forces into our main armeis in different area this is a lie and you know it

03:15:31 Apr 2nd 10 - Mr. Teirdel:

Selos, im talking about while we were fighting (north front during cf) not recently. You were moving armies into the blocker for w.e purpose. to us it looked like you were reinforcing. Now let me ask you this, the simple fact that we were watching you fill it up. cant this be interpreted that we mightve been planning to go to war yet again? Yes it can. though im sure it can also be manipulated in many other ways. O n selos you also were constantly moving troll armies to the block. I know i was watching you guys due to the fact you were taking a tad bit to pull back. No hard feelings like i said in message to bl. I was just making sure the bargain was held up.

This all happeneing DURING the 36 hour time period :). Im not sure when you exactly moved your armies out but i know it was recently.

03:32:13 Apr 2nd 10 - Mr. Selos:

i started to move my armies out and merge them into anthrax once bl sent us all the message that the cf was established

04:01:22 Apr 2nd 10 - Mr. Peace War And Suffering:

leaders of roc may kick me if you wish but i dont feel that my reputation on vu should be damiged by joining this fight. tho i would like to point out roc is a very good and honurable kingdom with grate leaders i just feel that this isent ur best decition.

greetings pws

Mr. Pantheon Curse (4/1/2010 11:40:59 PM)

Lots of action against Anti-Feds.... Can you get down here with quick Armies?

(If I already mailed this, disregard... I'm on Spring Break & quite drunk)

You (4/2/2010 2:42:36 AM)

got this thats all but mainly sowds to boost kd %

You (4/2/2010 2:57:23 AM)

i dont wish to be involved in this conflict and i feel that the leadership has acted dishonurbly.

greetings pws

04:12:54 Apr 2nd 10 - Sir Criminaly Insane:

this forum is stuffed now

04:14:22 Apr 2nd 10 - Mr. Arthur Dent:

Tbh the first time I saw Burlingtons message I thought that it meant just a 36 hour CF. But first off that doesn't make sense and second if it's unclear you should just ask for clarification...

Even so, I think this was an act of stupidity, not of dishonor. Just a lesson for everyone to be a little more specific... :/

04:23:44 Apr 2nd 10 - Praetorian Wyzer:

Can't we all just agree on one thing?

"No one EVER breaks a relation!"

That is how it is from that persons point of view.

So let us all just drop it, stop kicking it, and just let it be. Take note of what you want for the next era, and kill them if need be, in the game that is.

04:32:38 Apr 2nd 10 - Mr. Peace War And Suffering:

lol kill me for reail if u can O-o :P

07:53:46 Apr 2nd 10 - Lord Wraith Hearts Wwr:

When you ASSUME you make an ASS out of U and ME

I think thats enough said :)

08:16:08 Apr 2nd 10 - Sir Mcmax The Troll:

If just my leader would have remembered this little advice, then this whole thread wouldn't have existed:

Sir Mcmax The Troll

06:17:46 Mar 6th 10
As long as we make no agreements with any kingdom BL is in, I'm happy.

Besides the title is wrong. RoC players are not cowards.

08:21:04 Apr 2nd 10 - Mr. Chaos Legna:

Correct there leaders/vices just suck in general.

Really quite simple to fix and should have been fixed before even being agreed to but as you can see they played the "Oh it doesnt spell it out perfectly so I'll go around it card cause im so smart"

Really grow up dont twist its meaning for your benefit because it isnt spoon fed to you.

08:32:05 Apr 2nd 10 - Mr. Selos:

i dont think roc is cowards but i think that you did act dishonorably not NOT cawardly

12:25:30 Apr 2nd 10 - Mr. Samual:

Guys listen, its six hours till era ends, there is no point in continuing this debate, it could be said that ROC was in the wrong and it could be said that AntiFed miss interpreted the information. But whoevers fault it might be is it really worth spending your time on here just trying to fight it out, or could we just do the more mature option and say "Yeah it happened, but it is only a game and it isn't really worth getting wound up over"

Thanks

Samual

*Gets ready to hand out peace pipes and lily's*

00:29:32 Apr 3rd 10 - Mr. Orrises:

Mr. Selos

Report

18:49:22 Apr 1st 10 you didnt even have an army on our map bro
-------------------------------

i had a Armory in Arma at the corner of the map near the blocker everyday i sent 5k of orcs and some nazzies to the blocker top right of your core ... i was so close of taking out Sexdemon and the other dude's huge militia's just the day i could have defeated them .. CF was declared

00:54:08 Apr 3rd 10 - Mr. Han Solo:

OMG wow I never thought I would see this kind of arguement.

01:31:06 Apr 3rd 10 - Sir Burninglegion The Vengeful:

orrisses drop it , hartonious had a 45% on blockster.... you guys had over 350k ...prolly all level ones, he had 220k and yet he had 45%..... i know there was no one in that blocker whos single army could have taken him

since this game is now single combat, we had the upper hand ... you had lots of players of mediocore strength we had 5 strong players. the army sex demon was merly a fraction of the strength harontious army was.

discussion over, we know what happend and so does VU no need to contuine.

01:33:36 Apr 3rd 10 - Mr. Onslaught:

Wait, what happened?

04:20:17 Apr 3rd 10 - Mr. Selos:

lol go onslaught

[Top] Pages: (back) 1 2

Login
Username:	Don't have an account - Sign up!
Password:	Forgot your password - Retrive it!

My bookmarks Old forum design

- close -