I dont get it

I dont get it

18:00:47 May 24th 09 - Lord Primate Death:

Im saying I want to choose where I start.
There was also more troops on Val in the last 2 weeks than Fant and Mantrax combined. 5 kds were at war within a single screen area.

19:12:32 May 24th 09 - Commander Aligreat:

The wars on Val have nothing to do with this. Easy kills were over there, so everyone rushed.

Change the scoring slightly from

Land on fant+Troops on fant+Battles won^2 + Experience from hard battles^3

Land on fant+Troops on Fant+Battles won^2 + Experience from hard battles^1.2

However, change the rule for experience which is currently 1 exp if you win a fight against 5k DP or more.

1exp point for every 500 DP you kill.

So if you kill about 50mil DP over the era you get 100k points^1.2, not everyone is gonna kill 50mil DP in an era. Hell some people look as if they didnt even beat 1mil DP all era.

If you manage to beat 50mil DP in the era you get 1mil worth of points for doing so. However if you do very little and only kill 5mil DP over an era you only get 63k points from experience battles.

Thereby its no longer overpowering attacking. Its still got Fant as the place to be, and the only way you can win it through attacking is if you really go for it and kill as much as you can.

I doubt people are gonna make 50mil gaia and feed them to someone just so they can get 1mil points from fighting.

19:18:23 May 24th 09 - Sir Bob The Builder Smurf:

Good suggestion Ali, would encourage battles against the major players to get more DP

Only thing I would add is t he splitting the DP killed by a merge; so a merge killing a 1mil DP merge (2000 exp by your system...correct?) would split the Exp proportionally among the members of the merge (might also give the merge leader a slight uptick for taking the time to drive the merge)

19:18:29 May 24th 09 - Mr. Garlic:

I like the sound of that. Zeta! Theres your new scoring system right there!

But I was thinking, perhaps make some adjustment as to the experience gain of a merge. Like the leader only gets half the exp from the battle, the other half is divided on the other people in the merge.

19:21:45 May 24th 09 - Sir Bob The Builder Smurf:

Muahaha, beat you to it by 6 seconds Garlic! =P

19:26:47 May 24th 09 - Mr. Garlic:

two heads one mind.

19:29:37 May 24th 09 - Mr. Luls:

zero brainpower

19:38:16 May 24th 09 - Sir Twelve Inch Cucumber:

Mr. Luls

Report

01:29:37 May 25th 09 zero brainpower

= Cobra.

19:57:10 May 24th 09 - Sir Lychee:

I would like to see troop and building count on lower worlds added with some kind of percentage determining how much they count... So let's say: Fant 100%, Mant 50%, Zetamania 25%, etc., etc.?

22:16:56 May 24th 09 - Lord Primate Death:

In that case I really want to choose which world to start, not allow a VERY biased Zeta do it.

23:31:36 May 24th 09 - Mr. Knish:

Mr. Venomz

Report

11:21:45 May 24th 09

447.Mr. Knish o

404.Mr. Venomz

Total land: 6655 Batles won: 1 Cities captured: 0

Total killed: 1815 Science lvls: 5 Total troops: 13

F: 0% M: 0% Z: 0% S: 0% N: 0% V: 0% A: 0% T: 0% M: 98%
f Dorian Empire

Total land: 506910 Batles won: 0 Cities captured: 0

Total killed: 125190 Science lvls: 24 Total troops: 480497

F: 0% M: 0% Z: 0% S: 57% N: 0% V: 36% A: 0% T: 0% M: 0%

Farming doesn't help. i pwned yo face by winning 1 battle :p

Farming? Pft...

Sure, you beat me. That means you're very good. I'm sure everyone is just as impressed as I am.

23:41:42 May 24th 09 - Sir Erythnul:

Id think all that would matter is how you where able to help empire/members and how you personally thought you went .
Game has so many options on how players should be ranked only rank that should matter is who era is named after (whether they attacked/farmed both options need skill to do ).

[Top] Pages: (back) 1 2 3

Login
Username:	Don't have an account - Sign up!
Password:	Forgot your password - Retrive it!

My bookmarks Old forum design

- close -