Forums / In game politics / Valhalla 24

I strongly agree that a good community is what makes a game fun and enjoyable, win or lose

So far on this game it hasn't been so bad aside from a couple unlucky characters I made that got killed shortly after my protection period ended lol. Also my reputation is at a bad start as I appear to be considered an alternate account by some - hopefully that changes soon.

This era is all about learning for me as well, looking forward to the next where fewer mistakes will be made, especially with sciences.

Hi Rora, welcome to the game! For being a new player, I think you play very well. You gave us a fun skirmish over Watch Tower - which we attacked because it was perceived as an offensive maneuver. 

i like to keep things interesting ;) 

I agree, I think both Forsaken and Death Dealers are fantastic kingdoms to play with! I think Zetamania has great sportsmanship and respect for the most part, and that no one minds when people switch kingdoms to have some fun on the other side of the fence.

I was talking about when beginning a new era.

Dont forget how you failed many rof and once u did get them, u rof swords. 

Did I say there was a problem? I just find it hilarious once people do exactly what they flame others for doing. Otherwise I'm pretty happy with the challenge, it will provide experience for our newer players (and older as well).

And Zond, there is a reason why I failed so many times and the amount I did burn should provide a hint. I'm happy to rof swords if that's what you spam :)

I do it on purpose, I'm afraid, interpret my 'speech' as you like. Writing walls of text trying to justify my actions on a virtual game is pointless, so I leave it to the more manipulative amongst us to try. And yes, I did it again :)

Do exactly what they flame others for doing?

17:00:34 Nov 25th 13 - Zond (Sir Hoo Lee Schittt):

2 farmed kds, both with experienced/vet players. Attacking a kd that consist of a guide, a player helping teach, and a lot of new players. 

Just don't forget that part where you guys are dominating :)

Pretty sure he WAS being gang-banged by 2 KDs.

You're right, it's not like my KD didn't capture half his core or anything while he was fighting you guys... just kidding

01:32:25 Dec 5th 13 - Elite (Mr. Elite):
This 'apocalyptic' scenario turned out to be just Edd and Auroraa taking advanced Tribunal cities. Our intentions were to attack Carnage after we dealt with Lazy that was south of our core (who defended pretty damn good btw). That changed when Tribunal sent a few big armies on the offensive and NAP'ed Carnage. At that time the % were not as they are now, Carnage had nearly our size and you guys at least half.

(I omitted zonds posts so this doesn't get too long)

Read my post again, especially the underlined part, not our fault that Tribunal decided to send their armies south to fight us ignoring Carnage.

You're welcome to join in Zond.

Because it was no fact, at the time Zond made his posts complaining, the Tribunal armies were still inside their own core. They were only fighting you, Carnage, they only fought 2 kingdoms after that and it was only for a short period of time when they choose to send their armies to our core gates. After that you guys offered them NAP and only then did our armies go into offensive mode.

You could be a bit more specific, what part of any of my posts is bs?

Just going to speak my mind here. Not agreeing or disagreeing with anyone. Tbh I don't even have enough troops myself to do anything to any1 but can arma if need be btw so let me know. However I do want to know how many inactives are in carnage and what was the cause of the war between carnage and trib in the first place?

00:30:07 Dec 5th 13 - Teirdel (Saint Talveron):

16:12:10 Dec 5th 13 - Rora (Ms. Crystaaal):

"Do I need to say anything?"

Probably won't be any different that the arguments Eddie tried to make about the "LOS city" :). But yes, please explain if you'd like. You're not fooling anyone by claiming that an Elf city built with armories and MTs in prime position for core oversight is not an offensive maneuver. Why else would you need to build a 25.6k city in that location if not to have magic range on our core while armies marched on up from the South? Fair distance or not, you chose to advance on us and I'm willing to bet that city was a vital part of the strategy - otherwise you wouldn't have rebuilt it ( 2nd time was closer to your blockers). We may be new to the game, but we're not totally ignorant to war game strategy.

Yes, basically. I get long-winded on forums, sorry.

Anyway, moot argument as in the end it makes no difference of our losing situation. No hard feelings I hope, Rora. You played well against us for being just as new as we are.

I wouldn't trust you as far as I could throw you  :P

Don't you sweet talk me...  I'm not your type, I'm not inflatable!

That's ok Jenna, trust is earned :)

I'm ready for Armageddon if anyone wants to cast it

Alright ill attempt to cast it tonight. Edd also can as well so one of us are bound to get it.