|23:17:05 May 4th 07 - Prince Togglo:|
havent you all guys seen that dwarfs are owerpwned? Just look at the hmm lets see 5-6-7 latest eras its jus Dwarfs in the top , i think its time to randomize the game a bit ppl is picking dwarfs now its so many dwarfs around that i can cry ? coman zeta its time to do somthing about it.
Try to randomize the game will make it funnier , an exploring dwarf is hard to beat now more harder then an exploring , lets say halflinger.
|23:29:57 May 4th 07 - Mr. Hungrier Horse:|
Depends on what you classify as overpowered. In the sense of end scores, yes, but thats because end scores are predominantly land-based, which is easy as a dwarf to attain.
|23:58:21 May 4th 07 - Mr. The Viking:|
All the races are not at their normal position, all the race's units have been increased in unit power, and everytime a unit has it's power increased of a particular race, other races get weaker from it
|00:09:12 May 5th 07 - Sir Fizban:|
About 1/8 of the top 32 are non dwarves. If you wanted to make that list larger, but Swiffers gave the correct answer for that 'situation' there.
|00:15:43 May 5th 07 - Mr. Roxbury:|
I've been thinking about how to balance dwarves. Dwarves are very
strong, during all parts of the era. Early to mid round, they have
double the income of other races, and late era they have three times
the income (at the same land) assuming cavers are maxed. Add to this
the fact that they dont require tree, and that they grow exponentially
faster than other races, and due to more income can have more sci.
Dwarves lose a little late era due to high upkeep, but far from all
dwarves play agressive attacker.
|01:37:38 May 5th 07 - Mr. Duoth II:|
Being a Dwarf player myself, I think that dwarves are fine just the way they are. Yes, we have poorer military strength compared to all the other races and yes we do have a better economy system, but we suck in battle unless we have a good Military Science level behind us and because of this need for science, we still need trees.
Do not take away Cave Masters, I have personally only used them a handful of times and think that if you are a dwarf player who starts late like I did, then they are an excellent help to get you up somewhere around the bottom of the players who had started with the age.
|01:50:02 May 5th 07 - Mr. Super Sloth:|
The rankings are magnified by the fact that even 4 eras ago, 80% of those particular players would have chosen a different race (mostly Troll), but now all of the best players are just taking Dwarf.
|09:40:36 May 5th 07 - Mr. Gtan:|
I guess you can say a dwarf is a very good creature for the economy. But you can also start a topic saying that Orcs are overpowering...
It's just the way it is that every race has it own abillities.
|12:12:23 May 5th 07 - Mr. Crissxcross:|
as I said before in suggestion thread, just give dwarves an scorepenalty that they gain only about 80% of their original score and all is fine.
|14:07:25 May 5th 07 - Mr. Super Sloth:|
The reason that land appears to mean everything has to do with training troops from peasants. Ever since then, and the link with training cost to land, everyone basically trains the same amount of troops, and its usually elites. Dwarves train axemen, and trolls train the much cheaper warlords and mages, and usually end up with about the same.
|14:38:49 May 5th 07 - Mr. Dreadlord The Dressed:|
yeah cheap lv 4 units are overpowered in score.
|[Top] Pages: 1|
My bookmarksOld forum design