Forums / Miscellaneous Discussions / Europe and Canada Vs USA

for the person that said during WWII it was europe and america vs germany you are right. however germany also almost inhialated everyone by itself. if it wasnt for america going in and kicking their asses you may have lost. your troops were totally wiped out man. no hope was left for them, until reniforcments came, america who killed the *beep* out of the germans. so yeah us took out what was the rest of german troops which no one else could have done

WTF russia in this *beep*? no way man. russia is more than deffiantly asian man... just like 1/5 of its land is "european" but since the majority of it is in asia i cant possibly consider it euopean. plus USA would attack russia last knowing that would be their biggest foe...

Did you know that over 60% of the students in america, has trouble with finding europe on the map?
It would be hard for a country to attack, that which they do not know where is. Wouldn't it?:p

Anyways, someone mentioned the quality of troops. Well i would be happy to inform you that the US marines S - U - C - K - S compared to the British S.A.S, and the Norwegian Telemarks skvadronen. Norwegian and British soldiers, are considered the most efficient troops in the world. Ranked pretty high. But hey, what do i know... and what do i really care for that matter.
I just found a lot of the info spewed out in this here thread repulsive.

btw. Who want's Barrack Obama for president? I want him, he listens to Ludacris, thats whats up biatches! pz

Wow america's really are gun freaks >.< but unless your gonna walk to europe you'll need more than that.

SPAIN WOULD BE NUETRAL!

MUAUA, I WOULDNT BE HARMEDZ!

Yet still royal marines are better than the US marines.

The S.A.S really don't do much most of the time anyway... except sit in holes watching for enemy movements weeks at a time. *yawn*

SFSG probably does more... lol

Wilber ! <3

Mr. Gravity Report 8/18/2008 8:06:23 AM

ok, ok, someone brought up Rednecks... I and 3 of my friends have enough rifles and handguns together to arm over 50 men. thats just 4 of us. go look up the # of registered members in the NRA. I guarantee you, that they have >5 weapons per member. hehehe... thats enough to win right there. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Rifle_Association > 4,000,000 registered members... count that as 20,000,000 weapons, or 20,000,000 pissed off Americans standing at the shores, waiting to shoot your commie asses. with handfuls sitting behind eating popcorn and waiting to pick up a weapon. bring it.

That was me =P. REDNECKS RULE!!!!

Septim is american, born and raised.

And if not, we will do what we do for our olympians, we will buy him!!!!

Mr. Gravity

Report


8/18/2008 4:06:23 PMok, ok, someone brought up Rednecks...
I and 3 of my friends have enough rifles and handguns together to arm over 50 men.

thats just 4 of us.
go look up the # of registered members in the NRA.
I guarantee you, that they have >5 weapons per member.
hehehe... thats enough to win right there.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Rifle_Association
> 4,000,000 registered members...

count that as 20,000,000 weapons, or 20,000,000 pissed off Americans standing at the shores, waiting to shoot your commie asses. with handfuls sitting behind eating popcorn and waiting to pick up a weapon.

bring it.



LOL and u guys call the Palestinians terrorists for doing the same thing

lol they defend there country with the guns ^^ , just like u would have done

lol

Yeah, cause i said they would engage the entire royal marines. *beep*s.

They are masters of stealth, hence the 'War would be over, and europe wouldnt even know it!'

@ Mr. Peace War and Suffering, i am sorry. I did not mean the US marines, i ment the Navy Seals, must have been high on some *beep* when i wrote that.
Anyways, my point is that the Special Forces of America is low ranked compared to those in Europe, and the Russian for that matter.

just like 1/5 of its land is "european" but since the majority of it is in asia i cant possibly consider it euopean. plus USA would attack russia last knowing that would be their biggest foe...

Any clue howmany of the Russian population lives in that 1/5th part? ;) Russia is so European.

ye u hav to remember most of russia is freezing cold with hardly any inhabitants for miles.

i would invent the frezze grenade where everyone would frezze and then would shot all the frozen troops and laugh of them. hahaha. or light em on fire after frezzing them and they would get hypothermia. perfect stratigy right their. america has the worlds smartest people so what will any of you niggers do? sit their and be like "oh *beep* we got nukes but cant use them, but they have frezze bombs, fire bombs, and gasoline"

MUHAHAHAHAHA, lol in war you could have more troops, better equipment, and better training and you could still lose a war. so they is no point in saying who is best or who would win.

Sir Darkmarsbar Report 8/19/2008 4:42:26 PM

MUHAHAHAHAHA, lol in war you could have more troops, better equipment, and better training and you could still lose a war. so they is no point in saying who is best or who would win.

That's right,

Persians had ancient hand grenades, hundreds of thousands of troops, rhinos, huge dudes, elephants, and a seven foot tall King in a golden speedo with two much jewelry.

Spartans had one spear each, a barbute helmet each, a sword each, a red cape each, and a leather speedo each.

Who won?

Dude you just saw the movie while I saw the documentary and the spartans had bronze armor a bronze shield a spear and a sword so basicly spartans would only get harmed by arrows if they got shot in the eye.

Clearly this will never happen! We all know china controls all and would never allow a squabble like this to endanger their conquer-by-immigration tactic!

Just sit back and wait, in a few generations we will all be saying ni hao ^_^;;

Mr. Pieguy

Dude you just saw the movie while I saw the documentary and the spartans had bronze armor a bronze shield a spear and a sword so basicly spartans would only get harmed by arrows if they got shot in the eye.

Dude, what documentary did you see?  The one on the second disk of 300?  Spartans fought with shield, helmet, sandals, spear and short sword, and nothing else.  Well not entirely true, they did rub oil all over their bodies before they fought.  Maybe try reading a book, one from the history section, especially Greek History.

And just in case the documentary you saw did not include this, the Persians did not have monsters, or ogres on chains either.

Mr. Pieguy Report 8/20/2008 4:52:08 AM

Sir Harry The Crazy Report 8/20/2008 4:05:07 AM Wolflord Karac Report 8/19/2008 12:04:54 PM Yeah, cause i said they would engage the entire royal marines. *beep*s. They are masters of stealth, hence the 'War would be over, and europe wouldnt even know it!   Fine then, pit the S.B.S against the SEALs. I know Britain comes out victorious :)   Lol yeah right they would win you can barley see England on the map but you can see U.S.A and the seals are trained harder and if England's troops were so great why did we kick your asses in the American Revolution?

LOL...war of 1812...Burning of Washington

Mr. Pieguy Report 8/20/2008 5:52:08 AM

Sir Harry The Crazy Report 8/20/2008 4:05:07 AM Wolflord Karac Report 8/19/2008 12:04:54 PM Yeah, cause i said they would engage the entire royal marines. *beep*s. They are masters of stealth, hence the 'War would be over, and europe wouldnt even know it!   Fine then, pit the S.B.S against the SEALs. I know Britain comes out victorious :)   Lol yeah right they would win you can barley see England on the map but you can see U.S.A and the seals are trained harder and if England's troops were so great why did we kick your asses in the American Revolution?

Correct me if i'm wrong, but it wasn't just American Rebels... you had allies :)

lol ur the type that gives all americans a bad name. this is way alot of people dont like americans.

First of all this is fiction so quit with stupid remarks about it never happening, ofc it wont. But its a for-fun topic.

Now to the issue, just a little observation: USA can't even win the war in Iraq, how could they win vs Europe?

Though I do admit in the beginning of the war atleast USA would have the upper hand. USA spends almost 600 billion yearly on its military while Europe is somewhere around 400 billion(too lazy to add it all toghether). Many sites in Europe and USA would ofc be bombed.

But in the long run, Europes superior industrial power, manpower and access to strategic resources such as oil would give Europe the win.

Sure USA is further ahead in military science than most European countries, but soon enough all factories in Europe would be producing the latest fighters, bomers, tanks and ships. Not to mention the fact that we already have access to most american technology and in wartime we could easily get the rest of it via industrial espionage due to the large European population in USA.