Forums / Miscellaneous Discussions / Is merging back
| Is merging back | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
People of Erythnul
 
This ruler owns a bit more land than we do. This ruler is in protection! It's not possible to merge in protection.
^ see bottom part? | |||||||||||
You are in protection right now so you cant merge your own armies in protection. | |||||||||||
Guan If you realized The owner of the army is erythnul and the person who made the thread is Panic =P | |||||||||||
Interesting, would bring back some life to the game :) | |||||||||||
It definately would... Merging was good, ment the kingdom who work together best won. The way it should be, not camping in blockers with 2 million mu and 5 million axemen. | |||||||||||
exactly lol XD man I miss the old days... | |||||||||||
Yesh with great walls and stuff XD | |||||||||||
exactly. Ahh what great conflicts and battles we had :) huge kd wide merges and operations that really showed the unity and mettle of the kd. | |||||||||||
It really just showed who could spam the most troops and throw them together for a small hit then split up and take easy cheap shots on cities. Just my opinion. | |||||||||||
spamming will ruin your eco, and it seldom was a small hit when 2 kds made big merges lol :P | |||||||||||
When you merged in my day, you went down to 50% upkeep I believe. Besides, this would just encourage more people spamming troops into a blocker for merges that could kill off any prepping armies, thus taking a lot of tactic out of the game and putting in alot of block wars, slowing the game down drastically. | |||||||||||
I dunno about the 50% upkeep, but the merges enabled you to break blockers, since defenders donīt need to merge to stop you from getting trough, so the effect would be the opposite. | |||||||||||
Yes but they'd need to merge to get you off your city. And let's say it's a KD bigger than you. More members= more troops, as to where it is now with the having to have your army not necessarily having to be stronger, but instead you could CW your way through or sneak to another blocker. No merges has brought tactics into this game. Leave it that way. | |||||||||||
a big kd with no organisation could easily get pwned by a smaller better organized kd. This is a kd game after all, now its only personal skill that matters, kd organization is needless. | |||||||||||
Perhaps make it when in a merged army both the owner of the army and the commander if the army must pay upkeep and upkeep is still normal for both for example 500k troop would be about 1 mill upkeep both parties have to pay 1 mill just so it puts the larger kd of going down hill | |||||||||||
the merger things is better for small kds with inexperienced players who canīt pump out big armies, they get pwned by one good player due to the none merge system nowadays. | |||||||||||
The original post is just something Zeta forgot to change. | |||||||||||
Oh boo hoo. That's why you implement a better tutorial to solve your problem. Case closed. | |||||||||||
merges are both good and bad. right now you can have a kingdom all put big armies in blockers basically merging but with no way to attack the prepping army with all the troops in a city. this makes blockers impenetrable but can also make it impossible to get the prepping army off at the same time. with merges you can get the mega stalemates tho like the stale mate between Dark Blood and Phi i was a part of oh so many eras ago in era of asystole. good times! not! merges do need to come back with some tweak tho along with great walls | |||||||||||
Maybe make it maximum of 3peoples army in a merge | |||||||||||
02:09:47 Sep 23rd 10 - Mr. Pure: Guan If you realized The owner of the army is erythnul and the person who made the thread is Panic =P I realized that but I am just saying that you cant even in protection. What he was thinking was whether or not merging each others armies are back. I know what he was saying. | |||||||||||
| [Top] Pages: 1 | |||||||||||
Forum bookmarks Reset views