Forums / Miscellaneous Discussions / UN hope of the people
| UN hope of the people | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
What do you thing about United Nation do you thing that they are peace keepers or is just a organization that only fights for EU intresstet.And explain why you thing so. Could you also write about paste mistakes and failours of UN? Has UN done good things if so then what? Does UN fight for the human rights as they promised they would ? Do you thing that UN has become corruptet? | ||||
sounds like this guy us struggling with his homework :) | ||||
the UN is mainly around to stop another world war every one makes mistakes and failours. | ||||
U.N. Peterson stole my pants...the bastard... | ||||
Seems to me like you need to go do some research for your homework. | ||||
The UN Humanitarian side has made good strides I think (you can argue the same money with Red Cross/Crescent would have done the same...*shrug* dunno that detail) | ||||
I thing tha most important stuff about UN is that they have unlimited powars and nuclear weppons! The are like big and um nazguls and sheit! | ||||
[obvious sarcasm] The USA is not corrupt at all, I have no idea what you are talking about. Politicians don't steal money and use their power to further their own goals! | ||||
So you are making a school project and you want the VU community to do it for you? Thats not nice of you and i ORDER YOU TO STOP IT NOW! | ||||
hm
| ||||
the UN is just a coalition ... with very slow *erm, how do you call that* ... it is bassically too slow, too undecisive, too hesitant to act to make much difference, too many factions that bicker or veto, or do whatever is in THEIR best interest ... it is too soft (in flemish : "zachte heelmeesters maken stinkende wonden") the resolutions are often unrealisable, because ... well sometimes you have to consider reality ... and/or follow up on things, and be given enough power (read : a good mandate to actually be able to do something usefull in the field) (you could check out how they acted during the yugoslavian civilwar ..., and many other conflicts) | ||||
Ummm the fact is the UN only has power cause the US jioned had they not it would have failed long ago just like the first time but since the US did jion other nations followed suit. This is when people liked us though XD but we got a new president that might change it back to people liking the US instead of hating its guts :) | ||||
hating it's guts? arrogance is a better word, i'd say ... | ||||
well still UN has not the right to call them self Peace keepers and they canīt say that they fight for the human rights when there are alot of countries that breake does rules and they watch i am talking about Bonsien,Rwanda ,Burma ,Irak and USA that has broken many rules that has to do with human rights Peace Keepers that only has keeps Europas countries intresst is useless Sure has UN done good things but still there mistake is much more and there good things that they have done Peace is not something i can see Why do they have peace tropps when they dont use them | ||||
if you dont like this plz dont write is not like i forced you to write and i am di | ||||
UN isnt in EU interests, besides it's based in america, new york i think. But anyways, they're an organization that is spread thinly over tons of land. They dont have the manpower, they dont have the funds, and they dont have the decisive leadership to actually take any real kind of action. It doesn't really matter what they want to do, they have to be realistic, theyre a force that is meant to keep peace throught the world, now lets just count how many countries in the world are in a middle of a crisus...Well...Probly half of africa for one thing, but anyways you get my point...lol. | ||||
yeah but they have they power to change the world but i wonder why have they not done something | ||||
one word : politics | ||||
One word: Democracy. | ||||
jesus u made like 15 topics with the same idea | ||||
He really needs the homework done. | ||||
Maybe he is Ban Ki-Moon in disguise... | ||||
UN is a tool that the US uses to advance its economic and geopolitical agenda, in the sense that when they need someone else to pay for their wars, they go to the UN for backing (see Gulf War 1), or when they need legitimacy for trade blockades (see Iran), but they constantly stop the UN from doing international justice in countries like Palestine.. and then have the audacity to claim that the UN is a useless institution. | ||||
ROFLMFAO! "UN is a tool that the US uses...." Please stop, I pee'd a little on that one! | ||||
The UN is a waste of time. Nuclear deterrance has done far more for world peace. I guess all of those people who graduate with degrees in "International Relations" need somewhere to work, I just wish they weren't paid for by me. | ||||
@Rox, I conquer with Wyzer, haven't laughed that hard in awhile :| | ||||
you might want to look up when and where the US used their veto, when and where the US started a war against UN-advise (Irak? and others) ... the US is a part of the UN, but they can ignore what it says? how do you want the UN to hold any credibility? (ofcourse it's not just the US, that's why i said : politics) so, what roxbury said. | ||||
"ROFLMFAO! "UN is a tool that the US uses...." Please stop, I pee'd a little on that one!" | ||||
Very true all of this really. I mean the UN which was once League of Nations failed because the US didnt enter it. Not until we could control it did we actually enter. For a building with a big room that world leaders sit in and to discuss world issues and how to prevent wars is a total failure. And yes UN doesnt have the man power but thats why the US is called the World Police at times. We are the UN power when the Peackeepers cannot handle a situation hence Iraq which is pathetic. Turned from a war against a Dictator to guarding F*cking oil. We have our own we should just use it for christ sake. Mainly the UN is only around to prevent a World War III which i doubt they will be able to do. Everyone in there can break the rules and ignore them w/o punishment, its pathetic. We in the US abuse it all. We find the loop holes in all the rules. Any who my 2 cents im ready for the " Frankie your a dumbass" flames. | ||||
Clueless americans are clueless. Rox hit the nail on the head, the UN
was is and will be at least in the short term a US controlled
institution, to be used when they need it and ignored when they don't. | ||||
Usually every serious world issue turns into an American bashing thread. I mean we get blamed for BS. I mean come on we ended world war II. IF we havent had thrown our poorly trained military into combat. Just a quick question. But how can highly trained veteran russian soldiers lose 15 million soldiers to our poorly few week raw recruits of 400k? I mean it amases me. We gave Britain and most of england OUR money to rebuild their countrie*beep*ler, if we wouldnt have gotten involved woulda taken over the world. yes this is getting off topic but im turning the American Bashing thread into a european one. Now we may be in trillions of dollars in debt but call in our loans from england and other European countries that we gave them to rebuild their countries after world war II and we will be rich. Export instead of import and the national debt dramatically reduces. Use our own oil and export it(yes believe it or not we do have enough for it). We do all three of those and we will whipe that national debt clean. So stop american bashing. We are the world police. we save those who need saving. we dont sit back and watch innocent ppl get hurt. If we get into debt then so be it but with the loans we could call in debt would be gone. Oh and another thing that would fic it is if the stupid congress would stop spending our money actually our gold persay. Its not the president who spends our money or sends them to war or writes the laws so dont say it is for those who hate bush. Congress has to pass the bills to give money to start wars. They have to approve a decleration of war. And they are the ones that write the laws. The president can only veto it and then that veto can be veto with a 2/3 voted from the all powerfull CONGRESS. So its not us who are f*cking us over. its congress with all the power. | ||||
"The UN is nothing more than a failed hope of World Government." | ||||
The thing about the loans to europe, you were in no way being GENEROUS there. You were doing what any other country would have in your position, you saw a way of making easy money, and you took it. Those loans BANKRUPTED TONS of european countries and set us back years. UK didnt get the loan paid off until 3-7 years ago. And in WWII, even if you didnt come, germany would have EVENTUALLY been beaten, with many more lives lost and probly the soviet union in control of half of europe, but you forget about all the rebellions and systems set up incase of invasion. Britain for one had planned out the whole rebellion if we were to be taken over. But, yes you did save MANY lives, but you could have saved MANY more if you had intervened earlier, but you refused. Every single call for help from UK, france etc. were denied until you got bombed by japan and got FORCED into the war. I'm not against the USA, and I'm not saying I'm not thankful, just don't make out you did anything for anyone without seeing any gains for yourself... It's american patriots I just really can't stand sometimes...Besides, americans THRIVED because of WWII, the war was miles away from you and the loans and empty economies of the former war-zones is what enabled you to become the #1 superpower. Before WWII, there was still alot of countries in the brittish empire, but because the war was so close to home we went bankrupt and had to let go of the remaining lands. WWI came close to finishing us, but WWII was the death sentence lol. Anyways, once again, I'm NOT against america, just don't make out you're saints. | ||||
OK so there were 2 countries trying to produce the atomic bomb, Germany and USA. Now we beat Germany to the punch but what woulda happened if Germany woulda made it way before like they did with the machine guns, tanks, etc. Your precious little russia woulda been destroyed. Europe would have been destroyed. If they successful would have made that bomb every rebellion against Germany would have failed. Yes we denied to help you technically. Only due to congress tho. Hence while the president found a loop hole inside the peace decleration. We sent 50 battle ships to the aide of Britain. Then when we got congresses heads outta their asses when Pearl Harbor got bombed then we finally entered a BS war. We sent the greatest and largets fleet the world had ever seen straight to japan. The U.S.S. Enterprise aka Lucky E and her task force destroyed the japs while Eisenhower conducted the greatest land invasion of Germany. | ||||
But in all technicallity im an anarchist. I hate every type of government. Its all corrupet and should be burnt to the ground. From time to time the tree of liberty must be replenished with the the bloods of tyrants and patriots. Well the tree of liberty is corrupted by tyrants here in the USA. | ||||
| ||||
But how can highly trained veteran russian soldiers lose 15 million soldiers to our poorly few week raw recruits of 400k? | ||||
But, yes you did save MANY lives, but you could have saved MANY more if you had intervened earlier, but you refused. | ||||
I wasnt saying it as they lost it to us. I was saying as a comparison of how much they lost compared to our loses of WWII. I mean the russians were better trained then we were. We were just trying to get soldiers into the war so we could attack non-stop not training worth a damn. | ||||
"The president can only veto it and then that veto can be veto with a
2/3 voted from the all powerfull CONGRESS. So its not us who are
f*cking us over. its congress with all the power." | ||||
Frankie, the Soviet Union's military was not as well-trained as you seem to think. The front-line soldiers were often conscripted peasants, some without firearms. If you look at what Germany threw at the Soviet Union compared to what it had left to throw at the Allies in the west, there's really no comparison. Also keep in mind that the Soviets were advancing from the east as the Allies advanced from the west, and the German army was defending on more than one front. Comparing the two based on troop losses ignores a ton of extraneous variables, and there are reasons that the Soviets lost so many more troops than the Americans. | ||||
OK i stand corrected Hirgon. | ||||
One word: Democracy. | ||||
Ooooo low blow Hirgon. But very true. Democracy is just a word for us voters to feel safe. Like we actually have a say in what goes on in this country. Not even the elections for presidents are fair. They go by electoral votes not the ppls votes. Who cares if it takes longer, count the freaking ppls votes not the electoral votes. It doesnt matter if tehy got one more then the other person in votes the entire state shouldnt be able to vote for that president. All of our words should count but they dont. Instead ppl who we vote in gain the greatest power we could give them and some of them stunk. Honestly the only president i like is Harry S Truman. He always did what he thought was right and what the American ppl wanted not what these rich, scum, dumb politicians that we send to let our words be heard when its what they want not what we want. | ||||
I don't know enough about American Presidents to say, but I think some of the early ones may have been alright (if you ignore the whole oligarchy thing). In the democratic republic that is America, I am of the opinion that the government serves the interests of the capitalists, not the voters. In the 'democracy' that is the UN, the 'government' really consists of a conglomeration of governments serving the interests of their own people - it's more an attempt at a republican approach than a democracy. But now I'm rambling...I didn't mean it as a low blow, although maybe it was. | ||||
lol i was saying low blow as a good thing. Honestly in the USA our constitution is slowly disappearing. All our rights of freedom of speech, press, assembly, etc are gonna be gone soon. I mean we wont be able to talk about against the government or talk bad about the reps we send to congress even if its the truth. Idk slowly our government might turn into a communist government. | ||||
I dare them take my rights away I'm sure with a little help we could get our hands on a couple nukes and send them to congress as a present. | ||||
WOOOOO AOD <3!!!!!!! Lol then we would need to go to russia. But what im saying is go to china, speak against the government and then tell me what music you want played at your funeral cuz they will shoot you. This country will soon turn out like that if we arent careful. | ||||
This is like the room filled with plastic balls at McDonalds.. let the fat american kids loose in there and eventually they will tire eachother out and both go to sleep ;) | ||||
Also remember, Russia had another advantage....much like Napoleon found out earlier...it's pretty friggin' cold in Russia (esp. when your mad dash towards the oil fields you needed stalls out) | ||||
| [Top] Pages: 1 2 (next) | ||||
Forum bookmarks Reset views