| NASA To Bomb The Moon |
even if they used a nuclear warhead it wouldnt send the moon hurdling to earth or destroy the moon
|
- There is a tradition that the Man in the Moon enjoyed drinking, especially claret. An old ballad runs (original spelling):[7]
- "Our man in the moon drinks clarret,
- With powder-beef, turnep, and carret.
- If he doth so, why should not you
- Drink until the sky looks blew?"
learned too much about the man on the moon via Wiki, but I do like the way this man on the moon thinks :P
|
lol... u is a poet. haha!
I hear rumours of Moscow having long tradition with vodka :P cannot mess with the vodka. .. no more pointing O.o
I wasnt thinking the moon would fall down, tho that would certainly be mindblowing. I was thinking more like, uhmm... might not wanna mess with that since we dont know all about the gases and what happens? Im also thinking they might not care what I say xD
|
Mr. Kronos
Report
14:28:00 Oct 10th 09 |
amen to yo my friend for saying this
Duchess Orioles
Report
20:06:39 Oct 9th 09 |
I find it interesting how people are saying this is a
waste of money. What does it take to encourage people to explore new
lands? A cold war? A huge profit potential?
A lot of
world-changing technologies and discoveries were established by people
going "this probably won't do anything and will cost me money, but what
the hell, I might learn something useful from it that will help further
on down the road." |
im glad that others see it this way |
I agree completely, :) it's amazing some of the things we have discovered while basically wasting money (although this never went anywhere, i'm pretty sure it ended up using more energy creating the wave, but it's still cool) SEE YOU TUBE VIDEO HERE http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s_vjQgCvISU ">
|
Wow, you guys are all idiots.
|
Mr. Arthur Dent
Report
00:25:05 Oct 11th 09 Wow, you guys are all idiots.
-----
I'm curious about your grounds on saying that, or if your just saying it to make yourself feel good
|
"nukes are to high powered. They're talking about confined precision
explosions. A nuke would likely knock the moon away or send it
spiraling into earth."
A nuclear weapon is tiny on a planetary scale, there is absolutely no way it would have any effect on the moons orbit (considering the moon hasn't been effected by the many asteroids to strike it, many of which cause an explosion thousands of times larger than any nuke in existence).
|
"1) it is already common knowledge that there is vast amount of oil in
Alaska so no need to spend money in research to know where it is located
2)
the oil industry will be making untold amount of money with this new
gateway of fuel. in essence, the more oil there is, the less us
Americans have to pay per gallon (or liter for you non-Americans out
there :p). it is the supply and demand principle."
1) Yea we know it's there, we know where it is, but we would rather conserve our environment (Maybe even save the oil for when the rest of the world runs out).
2) Who cares about the oil industry? I don't. They are already the richest, most powerful corporations on the face of the earth, why would we want to put more money in their hands.
|
GO GO MOOON!!! ">
|
">
|
lol classic kitty classic
|
shurely if the nuke was placed at the center of the moon and it scattered some pieces could end up spiraling down to earth. as mutch as over alf the moon might have crashed.
and it would destroy all life on earth. i dont ffeel like caluculating the energie that would be released.
|
| [Top] Pages: (back) 1 2 |
