Forums / Questions and Answers / End of the era points

Why do some people with less points end up higher on the list then other people which have more points? For example... I have picked the first 20 players. Number 6 & 7 have more points then number 4. I don't get it.

And what about this one... i am 156th of the list. I have a score of 1.2 milion. And someone with 29 points is higher then i am.

Can some one explain this?

its counted by what you have on fantasia :)

I think it has something to do with the world differences.  Players located on Fant are automatically ranked above the other worlds, then Mant, zeta etc...  Total points are still added up but it's only the ones you have on the higher worlds that get you a decent ranking

Its counted by fantasia :) if you had something in fantasia you go up ;) you dont have anything your problem :) Zeta isnt the best man to make everything allright

I dont think that's fair to count. Some people have fought big wars in the lower worlds and fought hard for it and now they get this useless score. For example, PKS didn't attacked anyone on Fant, but did attacked Valhalla, Nirvana and maybe some other worlds

And what about FF, their highest member i on spot 120. but they have conquered Nirvana and had other wars, including a war on Starta. So this score is not really fair.

I got 3rd most points of this round, and I'm ranked 162th. The irony! haha

the moral of the story? Only fant counts now so suck it up and stop hiding ^^

well the winner comes from fant. so the hoh is based first on what you have on fant. then mantrax. then zetamania etc. the hoh shouldnt be in one long list but still split into maps i think. either way someone who is weak on fant will always be ahead of someone strong on mantrax

I looked at it at first and thought "WTF", but then I realized that they are split into different worlds, without reset places and titles telling you which world it is. Really confusing. =P

@ Delerium.    I have absolutely nothing on Mant. I was only playing on Starta and Nirvana and valhalla (I did had some cities in Fant which i took over from RET... but i got whiped out so i had nothing on fant anymore)

Lol i have just saw your topic.. :P And i have to say your formula is better then Zeta's one... :P

It's just not a fair calculation.

did you train your armies on starta tho

I had cities and armies on Fant, Mant, Starta, Nirvana, Valhalla, a scout on Arma (never could find Zetamania tho ^_^) , so I was happy to place where I did.  Good to know for next era what needs to happen to get to where you want to be...

I didn't train the troops on Starta. My arms was on Fant.

Thus that makes me more likely to be 4th, does it not? I had a city or two on Mant at one point but were lost.. that shouldn't affect it...

Only thing I can see being equal to the 200k (min) to about 300k (max) is the 220 odd million gold I had. Which means all my gold was stored on starta? Even with the lack of mines, warehouses or any buildings what-so-ever apart from 2 GTs.

I don't mind losing out (as such), the buggy scores is what I'm trying to investigate.

Yet another reason seperate worlds do VU a great service.

That wont work. Otherwise you'd get fant kds starting on lower worlds for a easy era win... Seperate worlds will always be awkward...