|19:25:37 Jan 23rd 08 - Lady Rhiannia:
please ignore the fact that i came back...i had to ask this question and sadly there is no place but the forums to ask it...
what would it be like for every player to play the entire era as individuals...in other words...no kingdoms...no alliances...each player for themselves. since most players play this way anyway...it might be fun.
|19:34:19 Jan 23rd 08 - Mr. Bobzon:
I agree. Could be fun. Zeta could make a map for Solo players;)
|19:36:04 Jan 23rd 08 - Sir Revenge:
I dont like it, people would just group up and help each other out
|19:40:58 Jan 23rd 08 - Sir Soc:
i've always been for it. sadly, most people aren't :(
revenge, glad u enjoyed playing with dak and company!
|19:41:11 Jan 23rd 08 - Lady Rhiannia:
like bobzon said...if there were a seperate world for those players who prefer to play outside of a kingdom...this would solve a lot of problems actually....those solo players would have more freedom to be as fierce and wild (no authority over them) as they please...while those who prefer working as a team and who prefer working with friends can play in the kingdom worlds.
|19:47:33 Jan 23rd 08 - Ms. Minge:
I love this idea.
|19:50:58 Jan 23rd 08 - Mr. Crissxcross:
fierce and wild ?
sounds like disobeying orders, beeing selfish and unable to kooperate.
Recently I met such person and that's why I agree with you to sent all the ***** to a sepperate world that none of them will ruin or betray a kingdom again....
|19:52:03 Jan 23rd 08 - Lady Rhiannia:
personally i dont plan on playing solo...i was thinking of the idea for those players who dont do well in a teamwork setting. if they had an alternate world where they could play solo...pvp...then the worlds that played in kingdoms...the kingdoms would run smoother as the members would be more organized with each member working together...as it is now half the members of each kingdom are off working their own agendas while trying to fill their dues as kingdom member and this doesnt get it.
|19:54:25 Jan 23rd 08 - Ms. Minge:
I think you're oversimplifying the matter. Maybe on the lower worlds you have "50% of the members off working their own agendas", but come to Fant, or at least, any of the top kingdoms, and you'll be sure to find by no stretch of the imagination 100% of the players working to a common goal.
|19:54:57 Jan 23rd 08 - Lady Rhiannia:
hmmmperhaps then on that solo world there should be a way to prevent that...like no ingame chat for that world. only these public forums...this way there could be no private communications to organize groups.
|19:57:55 Jan 23rd 08 - Ms. Minge:
Again Rhiannia, I don't think you understand.
|19:58:04 Jan 23rd 08 - Duke Arzun:
|19:58:05 Jan 23rd 08 - Lady Rhiannia:
the point is...a solo world is for ppl who WANT to play solo...so why would they make groups? if they want to play in groups then they can play in the kingdom worlds...there are many types of pvp games that ppl play...they work well. this is just an option not a forcing.
|19:59:34 Jan 23rd 08 - Ms. Minge:
Because people want to, and they also like to be asses.
|20:02:27 Jan 23rd 08 - Lady Rhiannia:
well...we cant stop the world for the asses, now can we?
i still think having a seperate world for pvp plang is a good idea.
then the solo players
ve more fun and we teamwork players can also enjoy the game more.
|20:03:40 Jan 23rd 08 - Lady Rhiannia:
stupid script writer "grumbles to self"
|20:14:30 Jan 23rd 08 - Lord Argyle:
Great idea of having this on a separate world, wouldn't bother me at all.
|20:14:55 Jan 23rd 08 - Lord Protector Nimic:
It's very naive to think that any free for all server would stay alliance-free. If not their normal kingdoms, people would certainly work together with friends.
|20:24:48 Jan 23rd 08 - Lady Rhiannia:
nimic...there are many players who actually like to fight their friends...and as i said before...no one will be forced to stay on this world or that one. if a player decides to play alone against other single players they will have the option of the solo world...if they die there and decide it is safer in a kindom world they can restart mid era one wone of those. but a player chooses to go to the solo world TO PLAY ALONE WITHOUT HELP...just for the fun and challenge of it. if they want alliances they can play on the kingdom worlds.
|20:27:44 Jan 23rd 08 - Mr. Neo Destroyer of Agent Smith:
Rhianna, you dont seem to see what they are saying. Sure you *Rhianna* would goto this world with the intention of playing solo to compete against others 1 vs 1. BUT there will be people who will goto those worlds and work with their friends to dominate it.
Yes people like to fight friends, but there are some who like to fight with friends too.
|20:32:48 Jan 23rd 08 - Mr. Haywood Jablowme:
i agree with neo. Technically, it will be 1 vs 1. But it will just be a NAP fest.
|20:42:11 Jan 23rd 08 - Sir Dead Oralive:
yea but the ones that are bold will become legends!
|20:42:38 Jan 23rd 08 - Mr. Haywood Jablowme:
and get ganged up on.
|20:43:52 Jan 23rd 08 - Sir Revenge:
|20:48:19 Jan 23rd 08 - Lady Rhiannia:
i suppose there is alwys someone that just has to ruin a good thing...they have their own world but just have to go destroy someone elses world and chance at having fun...personally i think players like that should be banned.
|20:48:54 Jan 23rd 08 - Sir Revenge:
|21:02:11 Jan 23rd 08 - Mr. Crissxcross:
well, if you are on such worl and would have to fight a player who can play 24/7 several weeks in a row you are forced to work with others together to even have a chance to survive...
SO saying ban them, is not a solution for this problem...
It is a common problem existing in many online games and till yet there was no game rule invented to prevent this (unballanced power) properly.
The only thing what helps is, when the playing community has enough sports spirits to seek an interesting and ballanced game, even when it means losing.....that's the only thing that helps.
Or you stop fighting humans and start to kill AI pics again.....
|21:07:13 Jan 23rd 08 - Lord Weirdgrivi The Epyon:
|21:29:38 Jan 23rd 08 - Mr. Dolfyn:
I say NO. if anyone wants a PvP, talk to the kd around and smash your armies in the middle of the map, a big clash, every two three days. Don`t see the reason. The one with the bigger army wins. In that kind of play the strategy is pointless, train a lot, high income and smash those armies. Well, kinda like now .. but more booooooooooooring!
|21:55:19 Jan 23rd 08 - Mr. Justainius Fontainius XI:
i lik this idea but u can easily abuse it
|21:57:13 Jan 23rd 08 - Mr. Haywood Jablowme:
|22:00:30 Jan 23rd 08 - Mr. Starks:
Why not ? Agreed with Ms. Rhiania.
A separate world for solo players. I think there might be a lot of players want to go solo. Sure there will be friends, alliances and etc. Well atleast they can't merge their armies and bashed up other players.
Of course the set back will be most of the players will probably farming till the end but if they likes it, so be it.
|22:03:52 Jan 23rd 08 - Mr. Justainius Fontainius XI:
ye i like it but i dont trust u lgc ppl hu settle near eachother :@
|22:10:58 Jan 23rd 08 - Sir Soc:
i would certainly join this world, and not make any peace. it would be a great time!
|22:11:25 Jan 23rd 08 - Mr. Sloth:
chess is a 1v1 game. an online game with hundreds of players is not. thanks for trying though.
|22:26:43 Jan 23rd 08 - Lady Rhiannia:
@ dolfyn...i never said i didnt like the game...i merely stated that players who have a hard time with the concept of teamwork may have more fun on a solo world. or to put it nicer...those who get bored with mega alliances and like the challenge of seeing if the could not only survive but comeout number one against the field of hundreds of other combatants at the end of era. i think it would be a fun challenge actually and might be tempted to play solo myself on occasion to break the regularness of each era being similar.
|22:27:33 Jan 23rd 08 - Mr. Bayushi Clamps:
I agree with Argyle. If it's on just one of the servers then I'm all for it. Since I won't be there I don't care if it's exploited or about any of the other problems with it because they won't hurt me. I say go for it.
|22:42:28 Jan 23rd 08 - Mr. Blah Blah The Brutal:
If you remove PM's, lock all forums for an era, remove in game chat for an era, remove all titles, remove the ability to name cities/armies, find a way to prevent players using IM programs/email/telephone for the era, prevent scouts from moving within a certain distance of each other and there's a chance that you may get to play a 1 vs 1 era without alliances.
|22:49:05 Jan 23rd 08 - Mr. Blah Blah The Brutal:
And anything else to do with the internet really
|22:53:38 Jan 23rd 08 - Mr. Arch Shade The Dark:
I would rather see different worlds containing different styles rather than 7-8 worlds being generally the exact same aside from size and starting time.
|22:56:41 Jan 23rd 08 - Mr. Blah Blah The Brutal:
spose you could use snail mail too
|23:26:15 Jan 23rd 08 - Lady Rhiannia:
So yes you would get lots of nap, but also lots of nap breakers
lol...i can just see the threads now ...instead of "-------kd name here--------" is a nap breaker"" threads...we will gets ""---------player name here----- is a nap breaker"" threads by the tons...will have to have a nap breaker forum just for them...lol
|23:46:06 Jan 23rd 08 - Mr. Gothrim:
IMHO, teamwork is one of the things that makes this game stand out. I must confess I'm not the world's greatest teamplayer irl myself. Perhaps a lot of us aren't. So it's good to see how well the kd system works here. Why trash kd's when the whole game and all the fine-tuning is built around them?
|06:42:19 Jan 24th 08 - Mr. Arch Shade The Dark:
Yeah I can understand that Gothrim. This is one of my favorite games that I have ever played in my entire life. I've played everything from first person shooters to mmorpg. It fits my life style and the way I like to play games. Watching the way kingdoms work together here is unique in the world of online games for sure.
|07:12:13 Jan 24th 08 - Ms. Erica Incarnate:
I think a world with no kingdoms is a good idea. It should be fun. Sure they will all team up. What's else is new? What im saying is, no merges, no free upkeep, The blockers will be defended by oneself etc. etc.. This should be fun. It make use of other races in a dwarf dominated rules.
|08:34:25 Jan 24th 08 - Lady Rhiannia:
|11:13:09 Jan 24th 08 - Mr. Dolfyn:
but .. in the world of testa, or any other .. if u or anyone else don`t join any kd is that world u are asking for ... am I right?
|12:27:49 Jan 24th 08 - Mr. Iciruam:
Agreed with Ms. Rhiania. Ok, we can say that it won't be a 1vs1 world, that they wil play together using IRC or MSN or whatever... but maybe not, so can't truly say what'll happen in that "KD free" world, let's try it and see what happens ^^ this is my opinion, don't try to judge what'll happen because we never know :P
|14:24:28 Jan 24th 08 - Ms. Minge:
Iciruam, it isn't "maybe they'll use IRC or MSN", they will.
|15:20:06 Jan 24th 08 - Mr. Bobzon:
Oh, come on people. Get over it. What Lady Rhiannia said and I fully agree is that there should be a world for Lonely players. NO AI, no Kingdoms.
|[Top] Pages: 1 2 (next)
My bookmarksOld forum design