Forums / In game politics / VU needs you

VU needs you
23:16:33 Aug 5th 09 - Sir Big Mac Attack:

Sir Caradoc



Report


17:11:24 Aug 5th 09 i wouldnt like 6 because all of the good kingdom would have to fight eachother only and then they would get flanked and that just ain cool son.


Instead we would rather separate them on different worlds, so they can feed on easy targets and are ALREADY flanking :P  (<----- not sure the current system is what works)


13:44:16 Aug 6th 09 - Prince Mielo:

A message from that Irish twit :) =

I personally didnt have a problem with what FATE did last era, any of the FATE vices i messaged im sure deep down can remember the messages I sent explaining my undestanding of their NAP with RVL. After all the era before JUICY napped MAD on Mantrax albeit after several wars, we were granted 2 in our core with 1 within spitting distance (nice imagery), i died OOP due to the fighting, yes it is possible to kill me ^_^. Fighting for Mant was irrelevant, hence our coming for Fant and unfortunately FATE (NAP with F+V blows my mind to this day) and it was obvious they would NAP RVL last era and come for us on Fant. Its almost exact mirror situations.

I would have congatulated TBL, as much as it wudda hurt seeing him relish in the praise from a person like me when he won the era if i was around. Personally Noa had the better era up untill I left, with TBL a close second. Altho there was half an era left so he obviously had a better 2nd half than Noa. So heres my belated congratulations.

FATE seem to think I hate them, hell even with the DB history with Carnage, in JUICY i didnt have much members who liked FATE as I did. Last era was a fine era from them and fully deserved victory, the recruitment of TBL was questionable imo....just mine. Although Im sure this will offend atleast him, if not the few who brokered the deal taking him in.

But this era its all changed, suddenly FATE have rocketed their member count and decided to NAP any threat going, you can sugar coat it all you like, deep down you know you NAPed too much, I know as a Fant KD you were going to have alot of pressure, after all JUICY went to FATE, got refused, then chose Rebirth as their NAP and tried to defend Fant, our chances were slim,we accepted that....hell i reckon if zeta had given us to day 100 (like he did this era) and not opened fant on day 50-55 then things could have been very different, probably would have died in the end but lasted longer in the era. But in the end, you've made this era too easy on yourself.

I can only assume Von Darkmoor is extremely inactive or has little influence over the council. There is no way he would have settled for this, even Dalak I thought would be the same, but he has come out defending their actions, so I guess that means he would. Sorry mate, im not sure if your being told to defend the kd or what but you never wudda stood for this normally.
What ive also noticed that the FATE rule of keeping quiet on the forums is blatantly ignored by TBL, when i was there we were baited but we managed to stay quiet, for the most part. But TBL seems to be above the law there. Which suggests that the council is too scared to stand up to him in fear of losing him, or he is infact gained himself a serious position on the council and is most likely calling the shots, after all this behaviour of FATE doesnt remind me of them, but instead of him.

Its highly likely FATE will win the era. But that does not mean those oppressed by the mighty alliance should just give up. Its a challenge, all those whining at FATE should shut up and try to take them down, you complain about them not making it a challenge for themselves. You have the challenge infront of you, take your best shot....if you fail, no big loss. Theres always next era.

I just hope FATE learn from this era.


14:26:09 Aug 6th 09 - Mr. Brainiac:

or die this era Lol


01:09:03 Aug 7th 09 - Sir Pubeguin The Hairy Cheezburger:

1. Irish leprechaun if you ever will see this. We never planned to have so many naps, just vices sent some questioning stuff and got back nap proposals almost same timing from 3 kds. Some of naps arent just naps its more like friendly relations for old good times.
2. You always forget me ;( even when we played in fate together i still was spammin, as now, same you leprechaun....


02:33:45 Aug 7th 09 - Sir Caradoc:

i have not really attacked anyone and im still on hoh. yeah thats right. talk your crap about feeding on smaller kingdoms but im just a farmer ;)


17:26:57 Aug 7th 09 - Mr. Chris:

Penguin in Fate? Wow... I thought I had seen it all...

This is low for the both of you ;)


17:30:02 Aug 7th 09 - Sir Big Mac Attack:

Sir PenguinFoundation38


17:33:26 Aug 7th 09 - Mr. Chris:

And your post is relevant why?


12:10:12 Aug 8th 09 - Mr. Gummahathy:

Dalek speaks Sence.
Though having so many NAP's is just ridiculous. Being a well varnished playr like yourself, I'm suprised you would allow such a thing.


12:13:24 Aug 8th 09 - Mr. Gummahathy:

Ali summed it up Also.


22:29:21 Aug 29th 09 - Mr. Saheir of The Reborn:

There's no way to control NAP's, because you can't force someone to attack another person, or keep someone from attacking another person. so you really can't tell a kingdom, "Hey, you've got one two many NAPs. You've got to attack (kingdom name) now", and expect them to really do as you say. And there's no possible way to improve the actual game configuration to allow for these restrictions because political relations can always be made on the side without any recorded data.

You can complain as much as you want about it, and you can call it dishonorable, but you can't get rid of people's greed for power.


22:31:01 Aug 29th 09 - Sir Big And Tasty:

...And the point of bumping this was?


[Top]  Pages:  (back) 1 2 

Login
Username: Don't have an account - Sign up!
Password: Forgot your password - Retrive it!

My bookmarksOld forum design


- close -
  Copyright © 1999-2024 Visual Utopia. All rights reserved. Page loaded in 0.02 seconds. Server time: 2:27:39 PM