Forums / In game politics / relations[community agreement]
relations[community agreement] | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
We should all agree not to sign more than 2 NAPs and 1 MAP per era. if you fail to follow these terms, all kingdoms turn on you and destroy you. this will bring back the fun to VU!!!! if you disagree with this, you are labeled a *beep* and are no longer allowed to play on fantasia. sweet, have a nice day all!!! ;) | ||||
*beep* I'm a *beep*! | ||||
i say more than two NAPs and one MAP, but not unlimited of them | ||||
League of Nations, anyone? We all know how well that worked :) | ||||
we must all nap each other and see who build the most peasants. | ||||
I want to build peasants | ||||
no more than 2 NAPS? | ||||
Oh oh oh Sun pass me the tools plz. I just got my Parts by mail. Let the peasant Building competition begin LOL | ||||
Anyone want to join the IINIM-allaince? :P (moved to politics) | ||||
Ooh! Ooh! I wanna join! | ||||
What is the IINIM Alliance? oO | ||||
i think he means it 2Nap1Map......., 2N1M...... did i make that any clearer at all? | ||||
Oh might liege Soccermage! How could I fail to like this suggestion? | ||||
well everyone has to agree to it....how the *beep* is that gonna happen? | ||||
By people being intelligent enough on a large scale to make the game more enjoyable? | ||||
fine, lets start signing up for it or something? right here, right now? | ||||
The major kingdoms will do whats practical.... | ||||
we must all nap together. we love peace and harmony. | ||||
Should we go out into the woods, light a fire, roast marshmellows and sing Kumbaya? | ||||
Why limit the number of NAP's and MAP's? If people want to be peacekeepers, that's fine. Then it's everyone else's job to give the peacekeepers something to keep peace over. =) | ||||
NAP and MAPing is based on honesty. I do not see how you could limit one's honesty policies. | ||||
just do what ever floats your boat ;0 | ||||
Mr Lassie wrote: "The major kingdoms will do whats practical...." | ||||
ABOLISH ALL KINGDOMS! LETS ALL GO UNTAGGED! NO MERGES! | ||||
ok, thats it, twamao improved my idea. great job! no tags, no merges, no kingdoms! FFA blood rampage! thats how i want to play VU FTW! | ||||
lol ZeTa, I don't know if anyone else got it... maybe it is just coincidence about the fast food mergering chains and you really mean 2NAP1MAP, but oh well :P | ||||
I got it!........after Bran explained it to me......but that still counts right? | ||||
even zeta agrees with me! yay! lol | ||||
someone agreeing with Soccer?? | ||||
I 1 2 |\|49 7#3 \v/0rl6!!!! | ||||
i think this is a good idea, it wills stop the old alliances in fant and give new kds a chance... | ||||
epyon, u only wish u were cool enough to even understand how to agree with me! (i dont really know what that even means :)) | ||||
I really think that would suck, I don't agree with it. What if I don't want to have a map? and what if I am in a small kingdom and need to nap 4 other small kingdoms to stand a chance against one big kingdom? | ||||
Argyle, it was a joke babe :) most of the others got it ;) | ||||
This whole no NAP or MAP thing is ridiculous... Think about it (don't hurt yourselves, though...). All you have to do is ask a neighboring kingdom, probably of equal strength, not to attack you, and you won't attack them. Assuming they have some honor (I could be imagining here) if they agree then voila, you have an unofficial NAP going. Example: Nemesis and Zeon this era. No official agreement (I think) and yet no war. Ta-da!!! MAKE PEACE NOT WAR! (Unless they deserve it =) | ||||
Pssst, what's honour? Abolishing kingdoms would be a good idea... absolute havoc :) How about 5 NAPs and 1 MAP? 2 is a bit small, and you shouldn't have more than one MAP, if even one. You can suddenly find yourself screwed by whoever you're MAPped with. | ||||
MAKE PEACE NOT WAR! (Unless they deserve it =) its the other way around. make war not peace! (no exceptions) | ||||
[Top] Pages: 1 |
Forum bookmarks Reset views